Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone_Slothrop
I think so, but that doesn't explain the reference to "incidents" in the proposed amendment.
|
I could make the argument that this sentence is to cover the following:
If the issue in MA (or an anticipated issue in other states) is not that marriage per se is permitted, but that some other kind of union must be permitted, under the state constitution, then the "incidents" part keeps the non-marriage union from looking like marriage.
