Quote:
Originally posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
I.e., Vermont.
|
I am not up on this. VT didn't specifically pass a law permitting same-sex unions? It came about because a court interpreted some part of their constitution or some other state law not directly addressing the issue as requiring that such unions be recognized? I was making the argument that the amendment isn't intended to restrict the ability of a state legislature to pass a law permitting marriage-type unions.
