Quote:
Originally posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
scroll then post.
VT said our equal protection requires state to offer gay marriage or an equivalent form extending benefits/rights/obligations of marraige to gay couples. Legislature opted for civil unions. If "incidents of marriage" were not included, then this amendment would not prevent another state court from doing teh same thing, and preventing state courts, as opposed to legislatures, to allowing civil unions, is one of the stated goals.
|
There is nothing between my post and the post I was responding to that would have provided enlightenment. But that's a technicality. I didn't scroll back up to check because I'm lazy.
What's STP? Sickly terrifying putrefecation?
