LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 127
0 members and 127 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 02-25-2004, 09:31 PM   #3555
Hank Chinaski
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
 
Hank Chinaski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,149
Ultimate destination

Quote:
Originally posted by ThurgreedMarshall
Here's my question: Why would a God who can create the universe (and who knows what beyond that, if anything) care if you believed in him or not? TM
Do you discount that God could have an ego? Is it beyond the realm of possibly that someone in a position of authority and control would want a little ass-kissing? Do you work at biglaw?

quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
i invented the "anticipated response"
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Quote:
TGI think this joke has gone from poking fun at paigow to most of you actually trying to take credit for something. and that makes it beyond played out.

TM
When I first read this, as always i thought i'd take your constructive criticism to heart, and never do an "I invented" post again.

Then, with reflection I realized this would be unfair to the board generally and you in particular. Let me explain:

Why does one post*?
All posts are driven by vanity- we think we can amuse, or educate, or contradict, or flame- but at the heart is a belief that some thought in our brain should be spread across this electronic table we share. That T. is vanity at its purest.

When I do an "I invented", I do believe it; I'm not teasing paigow. It is a manifistation of my vanity, as are all my posts.
I digress, but even your posts sometimes bear a hint of vanity.

You postulate that "I invented" posts are "played out" since they are based upon ego. I submit this is a diffficult test to follow in that all posts are ego-based. I suppose you could argue "I invented" posts are even MORE ego based than most.

Let go to your main thesis: "I invented" posts are strongly ego- based and "played."
I would never question your pronouncement of what is played. You know this sort of thing; surely i cannot shake the opinion.

But here is the rub- if an "I invented" post is 80% vanity, and thus not good for posting, then a line should be drawn to exclude such posts and all which are even more vanity.
In particular, the "its played" post is 86% vanity. If the "I've invented" is played as too much vanity, then QED, so is the "thats played" post. J'accuse Thurgreed, J'accuse!

This would be too slippery a slope. The board needs you to point out for it that which is played. Thus, we cannot draw the line you urge. I will thus continue with "I invented" posts.

*target of anticipated response

Last edited by Hank Chinaski; 02-26-2004 at 07:50 AM..
Hank Chinaski is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:22 AM.