LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 118
0 members and 118 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 02-27-2004, 01:32 PM   #3935
paigowprincess
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I was about to put an amusing remark here, but then I remembered.

Quote:
Originally posted by Sidd Finch
See? That's where you're wrong.* None of us really know the genesis of "Benedict Arnold."** We heard about it in grammar school from teachers who heard about it in their grammar school, and so on and so on and so on...*** Undoubtedly some historians think ole' Ben gets a bad rap. And some people who were actually there might think it's getting misused.**** And listening to those people complain about it would be every bit as boring as reading your complaints about the use of "Timmy."*****


*Okay, one place where you're wrong. I've got limited time today.

** Go ahead, prove me wrong. Tell me exactly what Ben did, and when, and why. Without using Google.

*** Two points if you can tell me the genesis of "and so on, and so on, and so on." Because if you can't, and you weren't there, you don't get to use those words.

**** Bilmore?


***** Is it apropos to say that you are being a Timmy Timmy?
I dont read asterisks bc they are anal lawyer nonsense. That said, I doubt you have the capacity to understand where I am right or wronb bc you are some kind of blustery litigator who tends to be overconfidence about his positions, whether in the court, on the board, or probably in life, if I know your type, and based ont he number of asterisks you ahve to rely on, I think I do.
 
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:17 PM.