LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 1,396
0 members and 1,396 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 6,698, 04-04-2025 at 04:12 AM.
View Single Post
Old 02-27-2004, 02:52 PM   #2567
Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
Moderator
 
Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Pop goes the chupacabra
Posts: 18,532
More on Hypocrits

Quote:
Originally posted by sgtclub
It's blind in that he has no investment control.
Then it's not blind so far as Halliburton stock. Since we've had this debate before , I went to dig up a cite. 5 CFR 2634.401(a)(2), the most relevant portion of which provides:

Quote:
A trust is considered to be ‘‘blind’’ only with regard to those trust assets about which no interested party has knowledge. When an interested party originally places assets in trust, that party still possesses knowledge about those assets. Those original assets remain financial interests of the Government official for purposes of 18 U.S.C. 208 or for any other Federal conflict of interest statutes or regulations, until the trustee notifies the official either that a particular original asset has been disposed of or that the asset’s value is less than $1000.
So, until Cheney is entirely divested of Halliburton, it still counts for conflict statutes and is not "blind", regardless of the fact that he can't control its disposition.

edited to fix tags -- T.S.
Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:39 AM.