Quote:
Originally posted by Not Me
I didn't say otherwise. But that doesn't mean that he has no obligation to obey the laws of the state of CA. Part of his responsibility to the people of SF is to behave in a lawful manner and in accordance with the CA constitution and state laws, too, not just municipal ordinances.
|
He also has an obligation to obey the state's constitution, which is what he claims, I believe legitimately, to be doing.
He has also made it abundantly clear that he would not defy a court order that says, in effect, that his reading of the constitution is wrong.
