LawTalkers
Forums
User Name
Remember Me?
Password
Register
FAQ
Calendar
Go to Page...
» Site Navigation
»
Homepage
»
Forums
»
Forum
>
User CP
>
FAQ
»
Online Users: 3,971
0 members and 3,971 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
»
Search Forums
»
Advanced Search
Thread
:
Politics: Onward from New Hampshire
View Single Post
03-02-2004, 03:18 PM
#
2672
Hank Chinaski
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,150
Get me Rewrite
Quote:
Originally posted by Atticus Grinch
Sorry, but God has a couple of other marriage-related policies that take priority over the unclean things that creep at the bottom of the sea.
[list=1][*]Marriage in the United States shall consist of a union between one man and one (or more) women. (
Gen 29:17-28
;
II Sam 3:2-5
).
[*]Marriage shall not impede a man's right to take concubines, in addition to his wife or wives. (
II Sam 5:13
;
I Kings 11:3
;
II Chron 11:21
)
[*]A marriage shall be considered valid only if the wife is a virgin. If the wife is not a virgin, she shall be executed. (
Deut 22:13-21
).
[*]Marriage of a believer and a non-believer shall be forbidden. (
Gen 24:3
;
Num 25:1-9
;
Ezra 9:12
;
Neh 10:30
)
[*]Since marriage is for life, neither this Constitution nor the constitution of any State, nor any state or federal law, shall be
construed to permit divorce. (
Deut 22:19
;
Mark 10:9
)
[*]If a married man dies without children, his brother shall marry the widow. If he refuses to marry his brother's widow or deliberately does not give her children, he shall pay a fine of one shoe, and be otherwise punished in a manner to be determined by law. (
Gen. 38:6-10
;
Deut 25:5-10
)
[*]If there are no acceptable men in your town, you may get your dad drunk and have sex with him tag-teaming with any sisters you may have. (
Gen 19:31-36
)[/list=1]
I look forward to seeing the best minds of the GOP come up with tenable Constitutional language enshrining these principles, and I look forward also to Ty's re-write that accomplishes them without the ambiguity that often results when the GOP leadership doesn't want to admit what its real agenda is.
as long as you're rewriting, I had this little thing with the family dog (female!) as an early teen. Could you add a little verse, kind of parallel to the one bite rule maybe, so nunc pro tunc, I can still get to heaven.
Last edited by Hank Chinaski; 03-02-2004 at
03:34 PM
..
Hank Chinaski
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Hank Chinaski
Powered by
vBadvanced
CMPS v3.0.1
All times are GMT -4. The time now is
12:21 AM
.
-- LawTalk Forums vBulletin 3 Style
-- vBulletin 2 Default
-- Ravio_Blue
-- Ravio_Orange
Contact Us
-
Lawtalkers
-
Top
Powered by:
vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By:
URLJet.com