LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 2,674
0 members and 2,674 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 03-03-2004, 05:41 PM   #2804
Tyrone Slothrop
Moderasaurus Rex
 
Tyrone Slothrop's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 33,084
Oh. My. God.

Quote:
Originally posted by bilmore
I'd like to see some attribution for this statement.
As would I, but we should not be surprised that someone who reports to Rumsfeld would wish to be anonymous here.

Quote:
I expect that we'll see some reaction from the admin soon on this.
Yes. Maybe a non-denial denial.

Quote:
Thinking back to that period, I can see why Bush & Co. might regard a major incursion into/attack on a part of Iraq, during the UN runup, to be a very problematic thing. Remember, at the urging of the loyal opposition, they were holding off on things until the world could render its yea or nay. To maybe jeapordize the ability to get Saddam out in order to get this lesser thug might not have been a good choice.
Maybe. Or maybe the military sources are right when they say that Bush & Co. wanted to be able to point to Zarqawi as a reason to invade. That's what some people were saying at the time. As the administration's credibility has ebbed on all of this, it sounds more and more plausible.

Quote:
But, I do have to say it's humorous to see Bush being attacked now because of his obsession with building coalitions.
If you were allowed to re-write this story, no doubt you would make it a comedy instead of a tragedy.
__________________
“It was fortunate that so few men acted according to moral principle, because it was so easy to get principles wrong, and a determined person acting on mistaken principles could really do some damage." - Larissa MacFarquhar
Tyrone Slothrop is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:21 PM.