LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 358
0 members and 358 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 03-03-2004, 11:16 PM   #2838
sgtclub
Serenity Now
 
sgtclub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Survivor Island
Posts: 7,007
Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone_Slothrop
I don't understand where this idea comes from that they would have had to "waste" political capital in order to waste this guy. Who was going to be upset? This was a terrorist group operating in Kurdistan, out of Saddam's control. The notion that someone would have seen this as an incursion on Saddam's sovereignty is laughable -- it was in the no-fly zone. "Small fish" to Saddam? No one is suggesting that this guy was allied with Saddam.
You must be kidding right? 1/3 of the EU was upset that we went in after 12 years and 17 fucking resolutions. If, at the time we were attempting to build a coalition, we went in unilaterally to assinate this cat, there would have been an uproar and I suspect that we would never have gotten 1441 passed (not that it matters at this point, because half the country has ignored that we had the legal right to go in under international law).

I meant "small fish compared to" Saddam.
sgtclub is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:02 AM.