Quote:
Originally posted by ltl/fb
That is so fucked up and wrong. Those jokers out there who act like it's science are insane and should be put away for their own safety. at best, biblical stuff should be in a history class and some pansy-assed liberal arts college where all the spoiled brat kids with first names like brittney and kennedy are sent by their upwardly mobile parents who couldn't argue their way out of a paper bag in front of a judge go. It's so pathetic how all these people on here call themselves lawyers when they can't even spew the diarrhea I call "rhetoric" out their ass-mouths. I'd kick their asses if they ever came up against me in front of a judge.
I wrote the above to demonstrate just how [bring] it is to respond to someone with a post acting like you are disagreeing with them but are really just using their post as a jumping off point for the same hackneyed bullshit rant that you've made countless times in the past.
|
Hey, I probably sneer at the religious with more "you're so fucking naive its pathetic" derision more than you, but I have to acknowledge that any idea which gets as many adherents as creationism is worth at least discussing in a history class. I'm not saying it should be discussed on its merits, but it is a footnote in history. When folks look back on the impact of Evolution, they should look at the idiocy it it spawned in reply. Such idiocy includes creationism and biblical literalism. Idiots and the backward tend to have quite an impact on history. In fact, far more so than they should.
I wrote this post to illustrate for those who may be late to the board today what a terrifically entertaining shrew you've been all day. Kids, this is what happens when the shrew hasn't had a good mating session in a while. Notice the fangs, the foam at the lips... the dialated pupils and furious typing. If she's not careful, she'll break a nail, which will make it really hard for her to crack open acorns in her lair.
