Quote:
Originally posted by bilmore
That was certainly interesting. I never thought the FCC would come right out and admit they were regulating concepts instead of word lists.
|
Oh, come on, Bilmore. You think the FCC would have been powerless to prevent me from reading euphemistic porno over the air. "She shuddered with delight has he slipped his hot, throbbing whangdoodle into her moist, ready hoo-ha." Ya think the FCC would have to let that go?
Indecency is both a word list and a set of concepts, at least with regard to the FCC's function of protecting sensitive (under 15 and over 65) ears and eyes.
"Depict sexual or excretory organs or activities." That's the standard. And it must be patently offensive, but God knows what that means.
Edit: Sorry, you were being sarcastic. I see that now.
