LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 3,031
0 members and 3,031 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 03-14-2004, 12:18 PM   #3431
Not Me
Too Lazy to Google
 
Not Me's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 4,460
FCC Levies Additional Fines Against Clear Channel

Quote:
Originally posted by Secret_Agent_Man
Apparently, Eliot was interviewing a female caller who said she was a big fan of Mr. Jeremy. The interview addressed such issues as the caller's habit of masturbating while watching Mr. Jeremy's videos, and included (inter alia) the use of a rather indelicate euphemism for the caller's sexual organs.

That meets the indecency standard, I believe.
I just cannot get all worked up about the FCC regulating that type of worthless speech on the public airwaves.

Having a license to broadcast your programming via a particular part of the EM spectrum isn't a right. It is a privilege. Just like a driver's license.
__________________
IRL I'm Charming.
Not Me is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:29 PM.