|
Prediction
Quote:
Originally posted by Shape Shifter
If this after-the-fact characterization is true, why did Blix say after the war began that he had "no doubt"* that wmds would be found? If the chief UN inspector believed this despite seeing no evidence, how can the Administration be faulted for believing the same? There is plenty of evidence to support your central premise that the White House overstated the imminent threat of Iraq's wmds. I just think Blix is probably the least reliable.
|
If you misheard Blix and he was saying that earlier he had no doubt that WMD would be found, then there's no problem. I don't know what he said, but it's hard to figure out what he meant unless you've got a quote.
__________________
“It was fortunate that so few men acted according to moral principle, because it was so easy to get principles wrong, and a determined person acting on mistaken principles could really do some damage." - Larissa MacFarquhar
|
