Quote:
Originally posted by ltl/fb
Comment: That is fucking ludicrous, in light of what we knew at the time was going on in N. Korea. Did al Quaeda not pose a greater or more immediate threat than Iraq? Or does that not count as a terrorist "state"? We surely are parsing words to the limit here.
Not that you care, but losing respect. A lot. And your posts aren't even funny if read as if one is in backwards world.
|
Lose all the respect you want, but until you can point me to a map that outlines the geographic borders of "terrorist state" I don't see how this is ludicrous. You may not agree, but I prefaced this whole stupid discussion with a qualification that words have meanings. Rumsfeld says essentially the same thing in the interview - he is careful with the words he uses.
