Quote:
Originally posted by Secret_Agent_Man
So, what IS your definition of IS?
It didn't convince the judge in the Paula Jones case, and your argument is roughly on par. Oh, how the standards have fallen since those first, heady days of 2001 when GOP operatives falsely accused Clinton staffers of doing extensive damage ("vandalism") to WH offices as they left. Or, have they?
|
If you read the words as they appear, not as you want them to appear, and if you believe Rumsfeld when he says that he chooses his words carefully, you should see that this is an legitimate and reasonable interpretation.
