Quote:
Originally posted by Secret_Agent_Man
So, what IS your definition of IS?
|
Statement 1 refers to the imminency of a nuclear threat from SH. R says, some say 5-7 years, but he's not sure S won't have nuclear weapons sooner.
Statement 2 says that SH's Iraq poses the most immediate threat to the world of all states or countries. Nothing about nukes. Nothing about loosely organized groups. Likely based on S's support of terrorism, instability added to ME through SH's actions, ongoing killings, seeming desire for expansion/conquest, known propensity to use large-scale non-nuke weapons.
If you all truly failed to understand those distinctions, there's not much to be said. If you understood them and piled on with this kiddie BS anyway, well, there's less.
