Quote:
Originally posted by sgtclub
I assume no one is arguing that my reading of statement 1 is not reasonable?
|
yeah, but it seems kind of disingenuous if no state at all is an immediate threat. That's like me being at a meeting of of only lawyers and saying "no one here is less of a lawyer than XYZ." Since everyone is a lawyer, that's a totally meaningless statement.
So he picked his words carefully so that they would SEEM to have a meaning, but really didn't.
Either that, or he meant that Iraq is an immediate threat.