Quote:
Originally posted by sgtclub
I do, and I think the description on oprah was far more graphic. Others are probably more familiar with the rules, but I think for indecency you need to show (a) graphic depiction and (b) purient interest. The depiction on Stern was far less graphic than Oprah.
|
I didn't find a transcript of Stern's show, just a summary of what stern said. I have seen/heard Stern and his stuff gets rather graphic.
I just don't think that Oprah's show appeals to the prurient interest whereas Stern's does.
Quote:
Originally posted by sgtclub
I heard the Oprah clip and it was not as clinical as the transcript suggests. In fact, the audience was filled with ooos and ahhhhs during the explanation in a nervous, embarrased, aroused sort of way.
|
I am sure it was nervousness and embarrasment, but I doubt it was arousal. And I doubt Oprah's purpose was to sexually arouse anyone.
Quote:
Originally posted by sgtclub
and if you don't think Oprah was trying to titilate her audience, I have a bridge to sell you.
|
I don't think she was trying to sexually arouse her audience with tales of teenage sexuality. I think it was an attempt to educate parents about what is going on with their kids. I am sure her audience consistes primarily of suburban moms.
