LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 390
0 members and 390 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 03-29-2004, 05:58 PM   #141
Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
Moderator
 
Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Pop goes the chupacabra
Posts: 18,532
Put down your gun, AG

Quote:
Originally posted by Atticus Grinch


So I would be comfortable relying on a 4-3 decision until it gets appealed to the SCOTUS, in which case all bets are off for stare decisis anyway.
Agreed. I didn't mean to suggest that lower courts would not be bound. But it seems to me, and I thought I was taught some basis for this in law school, that a justice would be less inclined to feel bound by stare decisis on a question resolved by the court as currently composed, but when that justice was recused, than on a question decided by an earlier court. That was my sole point--nothing broader.
Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:31 AM.