Quote:
Originally posted by sgtclub
But to say that the fact that she was an advisor to Clinton is not at all relevant is wrong. It goes to her credibility as an objective critic of Clarke's.
|
Only if you start with (misplaced) assumption that Clarke is a partisan or a Clintonista. In which case, why do you need objective criticism at all?
The way some people use the word, anyone who disagrees with the President is
ipso facto a partisan, and therefore the disagreement can be dismissed. It's just a little too cute.
