Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone_Slothrop
Only if you start with (misplaced) assumption that Clarke is a partisan or a Clintonista. In which case, why do you need objective criticism at all?
The way some people use the word, anyone who disagrees with the President is ipso facto a partisan, and therefore the disagreement can be dismissed. It's just a little too cute.
|
I think Clarke is in it for Clarke - not to sell books, but because he has an ego problem and was not happy with his reduced roll in this admin. This is not to say that some of his critism is not valid, but many discrepencies have been pointed out in the last week, and I suspect that Rice will point out more this week.