LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 142
0 members and 142 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 04-07-2004, 10:23 AM   #15
Hank Chinaski
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
 
Hank Chinaski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,149
Quote:
Originally posted by Shape Shifter
That is so hot.

God I need to get laid.
If you don't you might be getting cancer.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,116402,00.html

Quote:
Doctors: Sex Reduces Cancer in Men

Wednesday, April 07, 2004

CHICAGO — Contrary to some research, frequent sexual activity does not increase the risk of developing prostate cancer and might even reduce the danger, a study of nearly 30,000 men found.



Some previous studies have suggested that men who have frequent ejaculations — whether through sex or masturbation — might be more prone to prostate cancer (search). One theory is that lots of sex exposes men to various germs and viruses that somehow lead to prostate cancer.

On average, the men overall had four to seven ejaculations a month. No increased risk of prostate cancer was seen in men who reported more frequent ejaculations, and there appeared to be a decreased risk in men with the highest reported levels.

The two highest activity levels — 13 to 20 ejaculations a month, and at least 21 a month — were linked with decreased cancer risks of 14 percent and 33 percent respectively.

One theory is that frequent ejaculations help flush out cancer-causing chemicals or reduce the development of calcifications that have been linked with prostate cancer.
So I'm thinking, perfect excuse for the complaints about "closed doors with moaning every other afternoon" that come up in my annual review here. "You know, sir, preventative medicine is in everyone's best interest."

But the stupid doc doesn't know when to shut up:

Quote:
"It's too early to suggest that men should change their sexual habits to alter their prostate cancer risk," he said.
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
Hank Chinaski is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:24 AM.