|
Scalia Speaks on First Amendment , then Gives it a Good Stomping
Quote:
Originally posted by Not Bob
Well, in addition to being impeached but not removed, he paid a fine/sanction/whatever and had some bar troubles.
Are you suggesting that those were insufficient consequences? Do you think that he should have done time? If so, would Eglin be sufficient? Danbury? Or Atlanta, with the really bad criminals?
|
The question that will shed light on this issue is "Do any of the Dems on this board agree that Clinton should have faced these or other consequences for lying under oath?"
__________________
IRL I'm Charming.
|
