Quote:
Originally posted by bilmore
While I will say that, yes, it was a gross overgeneralization that won't stand strict scrutiny, I think it would be worthier if you addressed the meat of what she's saying, as a generalization, and not jump on the "here's an exception" train, especially when your exceptions seem to be posts specifically aimed at forming exceptions to that specific overgeneralization. If AG has to make a post that specifically says "here's one to put an end to the "we don't eat our own" paradigm", there's probably SOMETHING to the paradigm.
|
My god, you're right. I'll keep that in mind next time I want to tell a judge "well, your honor, the defendant's statement that this fact is undisputed is wrong, as shown by this piece of evidence that disputes it." After all, the existence of a thing is generally proof of its non-existence, right?
