LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 176
0 members and 176 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 04-14-2004, 05:16 PM   #1573
Diane_Keaton
Registered User
 
Diane_Keaton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: In Spheres, Scissoring Heather Locklear
Posts: 1,687
Profiling: (was 9/11, Gorelick something or other)

Quote:
Originally posted by Say_hello_for_me This issue has come up before, and I think its important not to equate "investigation", "interrogation" and "detention" as if all are always substantively equivalent.

I believe the original post (probably from a sock who's already moved on today to more exciting things) posited that after 9/11, nobody was against profiling of "swarthies" (Slave?) I think there continues to be a strong "anti-profiling of Arabs/Muslims" movement and the anti-profilers don't care whether the profiling is in the context of an investigation/interrogation/detention. They're just "against it". Like the people who are "against" world hunger.

I don't like to take a partisan view on this but...my instincts tell me that if , before 9/11, , investigators began heavy profiling of Arabs and Muslims based on the types of reports Rice was criticized for not having "all principals meetings" on, there'd have been much protest by both left wing and so-called "mainstream" democrats.

Bombs away.

Diane
Diane_Keaton is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:22 AM.