LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 263
0 members and 263 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 04-15-2004, 01:28 PM   #1662
Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
Moderator
 
Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Pop goes the chupacabra
Posts: 18,532
Quote:
Originally posted by The Larry Davis Experience
On the more narrow point, do you think it's fair to differentiate between warnings of hijackings and warnings of hijackers who use planes as missiles? Is one so qualitatively different than the other?
Hijackings, in the traditional sense, we've long been aware of. The best you can say is that airport security got really lazy and didn't detect the weapons used when brought through security. But that's not an intelligence failure.

And there's a critical difference in response. At best, the difference saves one of the two towers and the pentagon, because even if the fighters reach the planes, until one was crashed into a building, it was assumed they were the "usual" hijackings of the "take me to cuba" type.

But I guess that all future hijackers are screwed now, because basically you'll get shot down if you get anywhere near anything. So much for freeing Mumia.
Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:39 AM.