Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone_Slothrop
but it is absurd and yet predictable that the National Review would try to blame an Clinton DOJ official for this.
|
Ty, don't you get it? This shouldn't be something that is determined by point-counter-point editorials in the WaPo and the NR. Gorelick needs to testify under oath as to her role in all this. Just like Clinton did, and Rice did, and Ashcrofit did, and Reno did, and Bush and Cheney will be doing.
See, hun, that is the problem. Gorelick is making her case on an editorial page instead of before the Commission, where she should be making her case.
Now do you get the conflict of interest?
