LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 188
0 members and 188 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 05-12-2004, 02:40 PM   #4165
Hank Chinaski
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
 
Hank Chinaski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,149
All expenses paid

Quote:
Originally posted by ltl/fb
What are you talking about? Gatti was simply saying that the Administration (and/or Congress) have apparently taken it as a given that the abused prisoners were subject to the Geneva Convention, or should have been treated in accordance with it, so bilmore's apparent suggestion that they say "the abuse was OK because they weren't subject to the Geneva Convention because they weren't wearing fixed distinctive signs recognizable at a distance" is moot.

Though, for purely partisan reasons, I'd love to see them try that.
my point was "the abuse was okay because" might not be something Bush is trying to get to because he feels it isn't okay.
Hank Chinaski is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:50 AM.