LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 765
0 members and 765 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 05-20-2004, 09:06 AM   #184
Secret_Agent_Man
Classified
 
Secret_Agent_Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: You Never Know . . .
Posts: 4,266
The Floor is Open

Quote:
Originally posted by bilmore
When a discussion on what effects various religious beliefs might have on culture and development is ultimately met with the throw-away "well, now you're being racist" (or the religious equivalent), then that person calling "slur" has thrown the Hitler label, and surrenders. If a poster wants to call some subjects off-limits, that should be done before entering into the discussion.
So, you're expanding the "'Nazi" rule to cover express or implied allegations of racism?

Ok. I guess we should come up with a corrresponding list of words or phrases that conservatives are more likely to use which will cause them to automatically lose arguments.

For starters, I nominate the following:

(1) traitor
(2) unpatriotic
(3) aid and comfort to the enemy
(4) communist (when used as a slur)
(5) socialist (ditto)
(6) Clinton (when they are not the direct subject of the post)
(7) Waco (ditto)
(8) Ruby Ridge (ditto)
(9) murder marchers

Other nominations are welcome.

S_A_M


eta: These are later dubbed "Samuels", which I note only to facilitate use of the Search function.
__________________
"Courage is the price that life extracts for granting peace."

Voted Second Most Helpful Poster on the Politics Board.

Last edited by Tyrone Slothrop; 05-25-2004 at 12:38 PM..
Secret_Agent_Man is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:28 AM.