LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 100
0 members and 100 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 05-26-2004, 01:23 AM   #762
Gattigap
Southern charmer
 
Gattigap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: At the Great Altar of Passive Entertainment
Posts: 7,033
a friendly post in moderation

Quote:
Originally posted by Not Me
OMG!!! You are such a fucking asshole and you are proving everything I always have thought about you was right!!! We have posted nothing but the truth about the enemies of America. Yet you want to censor that.

Do you see now why those of you who call the panties on the head torture are so out to lunch? Can you even look at these photos of true torture? They are sickening. Now compare them to the pictures of Abu Ghraib.

Why can Ty allow photos of US soldiers smiling over dead Iraqis but not Iraqis smiling over dead bodies of Americans? Why, Ty, why?

No need to answer. I know why.
Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
You are a moron. I didn't censor anything -- I asked for comments about my non-censorship. [A few weeks ago,] There were pictures out of Fallujah of burnt corpses that would turn your stomach. I replaced those with a link -- which is hardly a form of censorship. If you look at the board FAQ, you will see that it says:
  • At present we only allow posting of explicit images on the Adult Board. Explicit images include those that have nudity or that depict graphic violence. If you intend to post such images on any board other than the Adult Board, you MUST post a link to the image, rather than posting the image itself, with a CLEAR explanation of what the link will lead to.

I think the pictures that you and Gin Rummy posted are explicit, and are not things that people will want on their screen in an office, but I was hoping to get more feedback tonight.

Has anyone posted pictures of dead Iraqis here? I don't remember them, but I think the same standard applies.

eta bracketed text
Ty:

I think Not Me is channeling her outrage at my post earlier today, which was not a post of photos of GIs smiling over dead Iraqi prisoners, nor even a link to the photos. Instead it was a fucking link to an article that discussed the photos, without even a link to the photos themselves. Given the context, it makes her outrage misplaced at best, and stupid at ... um ... well, stupid in pretty much all respects, really.

Not Me:

(1) You're a fool. If you're jonesing to flame Ty as a "fucking asshole," and partisan censor, you should spend the time to ensure that your facts are right.

(2) You're a hypocrite. If you truly are horrified by these "pictures of true torture," and think it's sickening for everyone to look at, then don't post them in the first place, dumbass.

I don't like the pictures. It reminds me of a time that's still raw for many folks. (In response to Ty's question, I don't think that these particular pics should be converted to links, as (unfortunately) there was a time that these damned things were splashed across CNN.) Not Me, I think that your prediliction to post images of the burning towers, and individuals leaping from them, is in the worst taste. Get some persp .... ah, never mind.

Slave:

Not that you have to weigh in here, but FWIW it's moments like these where I fail to see the amusing part.

Gattigap
__________________
I'm done with nonsense here. --- H. Chinaski
Gattigap is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:36 AM.