Quote:
Originally posted by Say_hello_for_me
Actually, we were talking about your contribution to terrorism and violence against Americans as demander of illegal narcotics, and our potential contribution to terrorism and violence against Americans as demanders of legal gasoline.
|
No. I was talking about the latter and then you didn't like the way that made you look so then you tried to find fault with me by talking about the former. Whatever. If I do something amoral (in your opinion), that doesn't excuse what you do. So it is silly to even go that route.
Quote:
Originally posted by Say_hello_for_me
You ended up arguing that you are now blameless so long as Budweiser executives refrain from violence against their competitors. Burp.
|
Dude, I am starting to think you are on crack. My reference to Budweiser was to point out the lack of violence associated with the sale of alcohol today when it is legal and contrast that to how much violence was associated with the sale of alcohol under prohibition. Much violence was associated with bootleg alcohol under prohibition as organized crime ran a large part of the bootleg business in this country back then. You may have heard of this man, his name was Al Capone. He had alot of people killed to protect his business.