» Site Navigation |
|
|
» Online Users: 3,420 |
| 0 members and 3,420 guests |
| No Members online |
| Most users ever online was 12,534, 02-14-2026 at 03:04 PM. |
|
 |
07-26-2007, 10:54 AM
|
#1
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Pop goes the chupacabra
Posts: 18,532
|
Roof racks
Thule or Yakima? For bikes, skis, and an extra-shit box (not all at once, duh).
Any preferences for one system or the other? Why?
__________________
[Dictated but not read]
|
|
|
07-26-2007, 11:02 AM
|
#2
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Government Yard in Trenchtown
Posts: 20,182
|
Roof racks
Quote:
Originally posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
...an extra-shit box (not all at once, duh).
Any preferences for one system or the other? Why?
|
I'd check with Romney on this one - I'm not sure a box is necessary at all.
|
|
|
07-26-2007, 02:41 PM
|
#3
|
|
the poor-man's spuckler
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 4,997
|
Roof racks
Quote:
Originally posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
Thule or Yakima? For bikes, skis, and an extra-shit box (not all at once, duh).
Any preferences for one system or the other? Why?
|
I've had both and don't feel that there is a major difference in the functionality of the accessories--although I haven't bought anything new in over 5 years, so it's just possible there's been a change.
The major thing has been that one or the other usually fits given cars better--thule was always the choice for VW, Audi, Volvo, Saab. Yakima generally fit Japanese cars better.
You have a BMW, no? I believe that Thule is the prefered option.
Also, there were different shaped "clips" to mount one brand of accessories to the other brand of rack, but, again, I don't know if they are still available--the one's I have I purchased on clearance, so they may have been discountinued.
|
|
|
07-26-2007, 03:08 PM
|
#4
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Pop goes the chupacabra
Posts: 18,532
|
Roof racks
Quote:
Originally posted by Cletus Miller
The major thing has been that one or the other usually fits given cars better--thule was always the choice for VW, Audi, Volvo, Saab. Yakima generally fit Japanese cars better.
|
Is this like an East Coast/West Coast rap battle among roof racks?
Since I already have rails, I would have thought the fit to the car is pretty irrelevant (well--that is I need it only to grip a rail, since I don't need the connection to the roof itself).
__________________
[Dictated but not read]
|
|
|
07-26-2007, 03:15 PM
|
#5
|
|
[witticism TBA]
Join Date: May 2007
Location: n00bville
Posts: 919
|
Roof racks
Quote:
Originally posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
Thule or Yakima? For bikes, skis, and an extra-shit box (not all at once, duh).
Any preferences for one system or the other? Why?
|
I like Thules better for bikes (at least when using the trays that require removal of the front wheel).
|
|
|
07-26-2007, 03:22 PM
|
#6
|
|
the poor-man's spuckler
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 4,997
|
Roof racks
Quote:
Originally posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
Is this like an East Coast/West Coast rap battle among roof racks?
Since I already have rails, I would have thought the fit to the car is pretty irrelevant (well--that is I need it only to grip a rail, since I don't need the connection to the roof itself).
|
Then that's different. If you don't need towers, then pick your preference on price and functionality of accessories, which consideration for compatibility with future car(s). No meaningful difference in attaching to the vehicle's existing luggage rails.
|
|
|
 |
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|