LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 694
0 members and 694 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 4,499, 10-26-2015 at 08:55 AM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 04-21-2004, 04:02 PM   #11
Not Me
Too Lazy to Google
 
Not Me's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 4,460
Private security firms

Quote:
Originally posted by Say_hello_for_me
I'm not sure you are adequately grasping the analogy of the tax code and volunteering etc....
The tax code part of my post was a joke. See I am a former quixotic libertarian sock turned into a predictible too-conservative-for-Ty sock. But who isn't?

Quote:
Originally posted by Say_hello_for_me
Volunteering is having a choice and taking it. In my example, the military would be a choice. Perhaps one choice among many. So, in that sense, you'd presumably get the same set of kids as you do now who would "volunteer" for th military. Particularly if you continued to pay them the same benefits (and paid volunteers in other programs less).
No, you are using a fucked up definition of choice. Having a choice is the system we have now. You can chose the Peace Corp or the military or Americorps or some other sort of volunteer work/service. Or you can chose not to. That is choice.
__________________
IRL I'm Charming.
Not Me is offline  
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:26 AM.