Politics: J'accuse!

[Not Me]

Originally posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy
So file your case already.

There are cases filed in Utah.

[Greedy,Greedy,Greedy]

Originally posted by Not Me

As long as all these folks living under one roof doesn't count as single-family in my single-family residence zoning district, I'm OK with this.

[The Larry Davis Experience]

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
the reports I read imply it was in an old artillary shell, but one without markings. that is it did not seem to be a fresh-made shell. That said, I agree with Ty, finding 1 old shell is not finding "WMD."

Question to the Dems- how many do we have to find before we did find them? 10/20/100?

50 shells. 40 if they're in good condition, not previously used as rolling pins, etc.

It's not just the Dems who are pointing out that the weapons aren't there; the rest of the world has kinda noticed too. So I would think the more interesting question is how many will it take for you and those on your side of the partisan fence to feel vindicated on this point? Would a stack of sarin shells in a farmhouse somewhere do it for you? A mobile weapons lab with some verifiable CW residue? Something else?

[Hank Chinaski]

Originally posted by The Larry Davis Experience
50 shells. 40 if they're in good condition, not previously used as rolling pins, etc.

It's not just the Dems who are pointing out that the weapons aren't there; the rest of the world has kinda noticed too. So I would think the more interesting question is how many will it take for you and those on your side of the partisan fence to feel vindicated on this point? Would a stack of sarin shells in a farmhouse somewhere do it for you? A mobile weapons lab with some verifiable CW residue? Something else?

Larry, I lack the energy to go back into this- but we were vindicated by what everyone believed would be there, or at least by the actions of the UN and Sadamm. As to further vindication, some shells someplace that clearly implies they were not just long forgotten from the Iran war or something would be enough.

[The Larry Davis Experience]

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
Larry, I lack the energy to go back into this-

When you say this I imagine you removing your glasses, running your hands through your hair and going through all the rest of the stress-reduction techniques my dad did when i totaled a car of his when I was 19.

but we were vindicated by what everyone believed would be there, or at least by the actions of the UN and Sadamm.

Not to get into the parsing of words mode that apparently dominated the weekend posts, but that is a strange prospective flavor of vindication you got there.

As to further vindication, some shells someplace that clearly implies they were not just long forgotten from the Iran war or something would be enough.

On this i think we agree.

etft

[sgtclub]

Originally posted by The Larry Davis Experience
When you say this I imagine you removing your glasses, running your hands through your hair and going through all the rest of the stress-reduction techniques my dad did when i totaled a car of his when I was 19.

Not to get into the parsing of words mode that apparently dominated the weekend posts, but that is a strange prospective flavor of vindication you got there.

On this i think we agree.

etft

Here's more info:

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,120137,00.html

It appears that these are from 1991. No tell me, is it more likely that there were just these 2 leftovers, or a whole host of them which we haven't found yet?

[Not Me]

Originally posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy
As long as all these folks living under one roof doesn't count as single-family in my single-family residence zoning district, I'm OK with this.

We are not talking about whether you are "OK" with this. We are talking about legalizing their union and giving them all the benefits of marriage.

You seem so concerned with Goodrich's kid. What about polygamist's children? Don't you care about them being stigmatized?

[Not Me]

Originally posted by The Larry Davis Experience
It's not just the Dems who are pointing out that the weapons aren't there; the rest of the world has kinda noticed too.

Would that be the part of the world that lined its own pockets with the oil-for-food program funds?

Originally posted by The Larry Davis Experience
So I would think the more interesting question is how many will it take for you and those on your side of the partisan fence to feel vindicated on this point? Would a stack of sarin shells in a farmhouse somewhere do it for you? A mobile weapons lab with some verifiable CW residue? Something else?

Wrong. We feel vindicated simply by the ouster of a mass murderer. Regime change alone was enough for us.

The WMDs are just icing on the cake to throw in your face.

[Not Me]

Originally posted by sgtclub
Here's more info:

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,120137,00.html

It appears that these are from 1991. No tell me, is it more likely that there were just these 2 leftovers, or a whole host of them which we haven't found yet?

I am sure there is a stockpile somewhere. They just aren't marked with a skull and bones to let you know that chemical weapons on inside. I bet the people who have them don't even realize what they have.

[ltl/fb]

Originally posted by Not Me
I am sure there is a stockpile somewhere. They just aren't marked with a skull and bones to let you know that chemical weapons on inside. I bet the people who have them don't even realize what they have.

I realize you are trolling for this, but why did we have to invade if the people who control the WMDs don't even know what they are?

[Not Me]

Originally posted by ltl/fb
I realize you are trolling for this, but why did we have to invade if the people who control the WMDs don't even know what they are?

Let me walk you through this. The guy who made the WMDs, you may have heard of him, his name is Saddam Hussein, knew they were WMDs, 'cuz you know he made them and all. But see, we deposed him and now other people have the stockpiles. The CW aren't marked and the people who now have them aren't SH so they don't know what it is that they have.

It is a potentially dangerous situation especially now since the media has alerted them to what it is that they have.

[Greedy,Greedy,Greedy]

Originally posted by Not Me
We are not talking about whether you are "OK" with this. We are talking about legalizing their union and giving them all the benefits of marriage.

You seem so concerned with Goodrich's kid. What about polygamist's children? Don't you care about them being stigmatized?

I'm thrilled to give them all the benefits of marriage other than single family zoning. They need to get their own apartment building.

Realize, I've been pretty ornery about this issue since Ty wouldn't let me build my dump. No dump, no polygamist with scores of wild little brats running around.

And, by the way, I really don't give a shit what taxes you may or may not pay, and what impact someone getting married has on them.

[Not Me]

Originally posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy
And, by the way, I really don't give a shit what taxes you may or may not pay, and what impact someone getting married has on them.

You Dems never do. This is why the House, Senate, and White House are all controlled by the Reps.

[The Larry Davis Experience]

Originally posted by sgtclub
Here's more info:

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,120137,00.html

It appears that these are from 1991.

Or even before that. The article quotes Kimmitt saying that this was a class of ordinance that was supposedly destroyed in 91.

No tell me, is it more likely that there were just these 2 leftovers, or a whole host of them which we haven't found yet?

I honestly have no idea. I sense that you feel one is more likely than the other, though.

[sgtclub]

[SPREE- SEMI NUDE PIC OF KERRY'S DAUGHTER]

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmp...slri5ml_photo0

EFS