» Site Navigation |
|
» Online Users: 193 |
0 members and 193 guests |
No Members online |
Most users ever online was 4,499, 10-26-2015 at 08:55 AM. |
|
![Closed Thread](http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/images/buttons/threadclosed.gif) |
|
11-01-2007, 10:51 PM
|
#3871
|
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Monty Capuletti's gazebo
Posts: 26,202
|
Still I build my towers high
Quote:
Originally posted by Oliver_Wendell_Ramone
Sheep Go to Heaven?
|
No. They just think they do.
__________________
All is for the best in the best of all possible worlds.
|
|
|
11-01-2007, 10:54 PM
|
#3872
|
Consigliere
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Pelosi Land!
Posts: 9,477
|
Still I build my towers high
Quote:
Oliver_Wendell_Ramone
Sheep Go to Heaven? Or maybe Jesus Wrote a Blank Check?
|
This is definitely a 10% joke.
|
|
|
11-01-2007, 10:59 PM
|
#3873
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: In Spheres, Scissoring Heather Locklear
Posts: 1,687
|
Speaking of Jesus (and apologies if this has already been talked about today) but the "I'm glad soldiers are dead" placard waving church folk in Kansas that I think RT was ambivalent about shutting up (freedom of speech)....was hit with an 11 million jury verdict. Assuming it holds up on appeal, does anyone know if this presumably tiny church in Kansas has insurance to pay that puppy? Can they personally go after whatever people are in whatever scary ownership mechanism they have in place for the balance?
Linky: http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/n...,3389889.story
__________________
"Before you criticize someone you should walk a mile in their shoes.That way, when you criticize someone you are a mile away from them.And you have their shoes."
|
|
|
11-01-2007, 10:59 PM
|
#3874
|
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Monty Capuletti's gazebo
Posts: 26,202
|
Still I build my towers high
Quote:
Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
This is definitely a 10% joke.
|
5%. That is a deeeep reference.
BTW, is that band as good as everyone claims? I always thought they were underappreciate geniuses in the same vein as overhyped underappreciated geniuses like Blind Melon.
__________________
All is for the best in the best of all possible worlds.
|
|
|
11-01-2007, 11:00 PM
|
#3875
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Government Yard in Trenchtown
Posts: 20,182
|
this sucks
Quote:
Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
The Tigers had this great young reliever, Zumaya, the guy throws 102, 103 even 104 MPH in 06.
|
I thought only Sidd Finch had beaten Ryan's 101.9 mph. Guess the kid is up there with Sidd.
|
|
|
11-01-2007, 11:08 PM
|
#3876
|
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,129
|
Etiquette Question
Quote:
Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
I wouldn't do it in Sunny's case, since she doesn't know the person that well, but if the person who dies lived a long, fun life, send a bottle of champagne, with a card saying "I thought of reasons to feel really bad, but he lived a good life. Thought this would help in toasting it." People like that, but it's got to be for a certain type of deceased.
Champagne is the most useful thing on the planet. It's good for you, for wedding gifts (send a good bottle to the couple's room), graduations, the holidays and for deaths. I like champagne. I wish I had some now, instead of this shiraz.
|
I'll stick with this Barolo.
Let me ask, isn't a Champagne gift only appropriate from a limited number of people? You say for a wedding gift. Okay. I see it from someone in the wedding party, but Aunt Miranda from Oxnard? The old friend who only was invited in the second wave once we heard that someone else couldn't make it?
I think it's presumptuous to send Champagne unless you are clearly THE person who should send it, ie best man.
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
|
|
|
11-01-2007, 11:36 PM
|
#3877
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Throwing a kettle over a pub
Posts: 14,743
|
Etiquette Question
Quote:
Originally posted by bold_n_brazen
And if the deceased is (was?) jewish, flowers, living or dead, are completely inappropriate.
|
You're trying my patience
Try pink carnations
Red roses, yellow daffodils
__________________
No no no, that's not gonna help. That's not gonna help and I'll tell you why: It doesn't unbang your Mom.
|
|
|
11-01-2007, 11:42 PM
|
#3878
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Throwing a kettle over a pub
Posts: 14,743
|
take me down little suzie, take me down
Quote:
Originally posted by Oliver_Wendell_Ramone
When you're in your basement room, with a needle and a spoon?
|
My vote for best Stones song.
__________________
No no no, that's not gonna help. That's not gonna help and I'll tell you why: It doesn't unbang your Mom.
|
|
|
11-01-2007, 11:45 PM
|
#3879
|
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Monty Capuletti's gazebo
Posts: 26,202
|
Etiquette Question
Quote:
Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
I'll stick with this Barolo.
Let me ask, isn't a Champagne gift only appropriate from a limited number of people? You say for a wedding gift. Okay. I see it from someone in the wedding party, but Aunt Miranda from Oxnard? The old friend who only was invited in the second wave once we heard that someone else couldn't make it?
I think it's presumptuous to send Champagne unless you are clearly THE person who should send it, ie best man.
|
Yes. That's true. It's a thing to be sent to friends. But that's not limited to the best man. You can send it if you're an old college or high school buddy.
__________________
All is for the best in the best of all possible worlds.
|
|
|
11-01-2007, 11:51 PM
|
#3880
|
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Monty Capuletti's gazebo
Posts: 26,202
|
take me down little suzie, take me down
Quote:
Originally posted by Did you just call me Coltrane?
My vote for best Stones song.
|
It's up there, but IMO, that title belongs to "Gimme Shelter." That tune is all the best styles of rock slammed into one 5 minute run.
And "Sticky Fingers," as I think Slave has noted in the past, has "Moonlight Mile" on it, possibly the most underrated Stones classic. As well as their greatest riff, "Can't You Hear me Knocking."
__________________
All is for the best in the best of all possible worlds.
|
|
|
11-01-2007, 11:53 PM
|
#3881
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,565
|
Etiquette Question
Quote:
Originally posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy
On behalf of the rest of the board, I would like to apologize for the brusque and brazen manner in which we respond to sensitive and touching queries such as this.
You have my most sincere apology. On their behalf, I also would like to say I'm sorry for Fringie (you must forgive her, it is her way)and for Flower, for what he would post if he did. Flower is sorry.
I have found that one of the most sensitive things to do when meeting someone is to actually listen to and remember their name. I realize some of us have names that are difficult, especially for Americans who have such simple and boring names for the most part, but showing someone the common courtesy of taking an interest in who they are and remembering their name is always a good idea. To be truly supportive of your friend, I would suggest that when you meet her next mother-in-law, you say hello, you ask her her name, and then you say, "Good to meet you, Mrs. Sarkoziliskistadian", repeating the name over. That way, your scrawled message following her death will not simply scream out "I didn't give a shit while you were alive but don't want to be thought a clod now."
I hope this was helpful.
Sensitively yours,
G^3
|
The key is to say the name to yourself 1 minute after the meeting then 10 minutes after the meeting.
I f you care.
|
|
|
11-01-2007, 11:57 PM
|
#3882
|
Wearing the cranky pants
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Pulling your finger
Posts: 7,119
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Diane_Keaton
Speaking of Jesus (and apologies if this has already been talked about today) but the "I'm glad soldiers are dead" placard waving church folk in Kansas that I think RT was ambivalent about shutting up (freedom of speech)....was hit with an 11 million jury verdict. Assuming it holds up on appeal, does anyone know if this presumably tiny church in Kansas has insurance to pay that puppy? Can they personally go after whatever people are in whatever scary ownership mechanism they have in place for the balance?
Linky: http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/n...,3389889.story
|
In CA, such insurance would be illegal and unenforcable because they were hit with intentional infliction of emotional distress and punitive damages, and you cannot insure intentional acts or punis. They might have Bermuda insurance (where such things are allowed), but I doubt it.
__________________
Boogers!
|
|
|
11-02-2007, 12:12 AM
|
#3883
|
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,129
|
take me down little suzie, take me down
Quote:
Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
It's up there, but IMO, that title belongs to "Gimme Shelter." That tune is all the best styles of rock slammed into one 5 minute run.
And "Sticky Fingers," as I think Slave has noted in the past, has "Moonlight Mile" on it, possibly the most underrated Stones classic. As well as their greatest riff, "Can't You Hear me Knocking."
|
On my shuffle I have some things from Satanic majesty's for cool down, last quarter mile. Sticky Fingers is great, but i recently had occasion to imagine what a semi-hip bar band might cover in 1995, and the Stones' that i picked was Happy. (plenty of older stuff is great).
the one 60s iconic band that could start today, play the same music, and still be popular (the Stooges are not iconic).
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
|
|
|
11-02-2007, 12:31 AM
|
#3884
|
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Monty Capuletti's gazebo
Posts: 26,202
|
take me down little suzie, take me down
Quote:
Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
On my shuffle I have some things from Satanic majesty's for cool down, last quarter mile. Sticky Fingers is great, but i recently had occasion to imagine what a semi-hip bar band might cover in 1995, and the Stones' that i picked was Happy. (plenty of older stuff is great).
the one 60s iconic band that could start today, play the same music, and still be popular (the Stooges are not iconic).
|
I still love "Why Don't We Sing This Song All Together."
__________________
All is for the best in the best of all possible worlds.
|
|
|
11-02-2007, 12:53 AM
|
#3885
|
Patch Diva
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Winter Wonderland
Posts: 4,607
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Diane_Keaton
Speaking of Jesus (and apologies if this has already been talked about today) but the "I'm glad soldiers are dead" placard waving church folk in Kansas that I think RT was ambivalent about shutting up (freedom of speech)....was hit with an 11 million jury verdict. Assuming it holds up on appeal, does anyone know if this presumably tiny church in Kansas has insurance to pay that puppy? Can they personally go after whatever people are in whatever scary ownership mechanism they have in place for the balance?
Linky: http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/n...,3389889.story
|
Those Phelps people just make me crazy. It would be nice if the judgment reduced -- or preferably eliminated -- the funds they have available to travel around the country spreading hate.
Minnesota is one of the states with laws prohibiting protests at funerals.
|
|
|
![Closed Thread](http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/images/buttons/threadclosed.gif) |
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|