New Fashion Board 10-3-2003 - 11-7-2003 - Page 123

evenodds · 10-15-2003, 01:51 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by ThrashersFan
"Lawyers for the accused rapist created shock waves again, saying that a DNA analysis of the 19-year-old accuser's underpants showed "other substances" from a "source" that wasn't Bryant. "

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,100131,00.html

Wow, kinda makes you wonder what would be discovered in your own underpants.

ESPN reports that there were two sets of underpants examined. The pair with a substance other than Bryant's were not the ones she was wearing the night of the attack.

ltl/fb · 10-15-2003, 01:55 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by evenodds
ESPN reports that there were two sets of underpants examined. The pair with a substance other than Bryant's were not the ones she was wearing the night of the attack.

I am shocked and appalled to see that foxnews.com might give a reader the wrong impression as to relevant facts. Horrified, I tell you.

ThrashersFan · 10-15-2003, 01:57 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by ltl/fb
I am shocked and appalled to see that foxnews.com might give a reader the wrong impression as to relevant facts. Horrified, I tell you.

I didn't think that Fox News did that -- the defense lawyer did. Anyway, I just posted it to see if anyone had anything interesting in their underpants or any "substances in underpants" stories.

SlaveNoMore · 10-15-2003, 01:57 PM

Quote:

evenodds
ESPN reports that there were two sets of underpants examined. The pair with a substance other than Bryant's were not the ones she was wearing the night of the attack.

Which proves that she might not have been a virgin. Shock and Awe!!!

Since this is the rape trial of Kobe Bryant and not the trial of Joan of Arc, I really don't see the point.

If anything, these strong arm tactics by the defense are making Kobe look worse.

ltl/fb · 10-15-2003, 01:59 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
Which proves that she might not have been a virgin. Shock and Awe!!!

Since this is the rape trial of Kobe Bryant and not the trial of Joan of Arc, I really don't see the point.

If anything, these strong arm tactics by the defense are making Kobe look worse.

Well, really, if you think about it, the mere fact that she is still alive -- that she didn't fight back hard enough to actually die -- is proof positive that she was asking for it. That whore.

And now to find out she wasn't even a virgin? Once a woman has had sex once (consensually or otherwise) she really can't object to ever having it again, with anyone.

evenodds · 10-15-2003, 01:59 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by ThrashersFan
I didn't think that Fox News did that -- the defense lawyer did. Anyway, I just posted it to see if anyone had anything interesting in their underpants or any "substances in underpants" stories.

You're assuming people here wear underpants.

Penske_Account · 10-15-2003, 02:00 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by ltl/fb
I am shocked and appalled to see that foxnews.com might give a reader the wrong impression as to relevant facts. Horrified, I tell you.

My [cursory] read of the FoxNews article did not find a reference to the non-kobe seeded underpants being ones that she wore on the fateful night. Just that another seeded pair existed. Maybe you need to be a bit more discerning in absorbing your news.

ltl/fb · 10-15-2003, 02:01 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by ThrashersFan
I didn't think that Fox News did that -- the defense lawyer did. Anyway, I just posted it to see if anyone had anything interesting in their underpants or any "substances in underpants" stories.

I would expect it from the defense. But why didn't Fox report what ESPN did (that the underpants with non-Kobe gunk in them were not the ones worn on the night of the attack)? It seems kinda you know like maybe relevant.

Penske_Account · 10-15-2003, 02:01 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by evenodds
You're assuming people here wear underpants.

What day is it?

ltl/fb · 10-15-2003, 02:02 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Penske_Account
My [cursory] read of the FoxNews article did not find a reference to the non-kobe seeded underpants being ones that she wore on the fateful night. Just that another seeded pair existed. Maybe you need to be a bit more discerning in absorbing your news.

Ah yes. I'm sure that most of foxnews's's readers, if asked, would make that distinction.

ThrashersFan · 10-15-2003, 02:02 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by evenodds
You're assuming people here wear underpants.

I don't, which is why I was hoping to live vicariously through the stories of those who do.

Penske_Account · 10-15-2003, 02:04 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by ltl/fb
Ah yes. I'm sure that most of foxnews's's readers, if asked, would make that distinction.

Luckily, America has unbiased non-partisan newspapers like the NYTimes and the Washington Post, so we don't have to rely on the slanted right wing controlled TV media.

ltl/fb · 10-15-2003, 02:05 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Penske_Account
Luckily, America has unbiased non-partisan newspapers like the NYTimes and the Washington Post, so we don't have to rely on the slanted right wing controlled TV media.

You are right. I am wrong.

It is no coincidence that both "left" and "wrong" are the opposite of "right."

Edited to add that I think you missed a hyphen.

Shape Shifter · 10-15-2003, 02:06 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by ltl/fb
Ah yes. I'm sure that most of foxnews's's readers, if asked, would make that distinction.

They found wmds?

Aloha Mr. Learned Hand · 10-15-2003, 02:06 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Penske_Account
How about Goose Island? That's brewed in chicago, no?

It is, and it's pretty good stuff. I don't think they mass produce enough to sell it widely at the ballparks.

Besides, the Old Style/Cubs connection is longstanding at Wrigley. They even sell it alongside the usual array of Bud products that Harry was so fond of... It (used to be anyway) is sold slightly cheaper, so the drunken frat boys in the bleachers love it.