New Fashion Board 10-3-2003 - 11-7-2003 - Page 379

leagleaze · 11-03-2003, 02:08 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by ThurgreedMarshall

I defy anyone to find a good photo of her teeth, which must be bad too.

TM

Shape Shifter · 11-03-2003, 02:09 PM

If the men's restroom on the floor is out of order, where does one find the sports page?

dc_chef · 11-03-2003, 02:13 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by ABBAKiss
She claimed to not have implants? Really? That's recockulous.

Yup, could have sworn that I just saw something about that (not the first time I would have seen it) in the Us magazine I was flipping through while in line at the supermarket the other day.

And nice use of recockulous.

robustpuppy · 11-03-2003, 02:19 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by ABBAKiss
She claimed to not have implants? Really? That's recockulous.

Not that I, ahem, ever watched the show, but anyone who has seen a circa 1991 episode of 90210 knows the truth.

Replaced_Texan · 11-03-2003, 02:28 PM

November is the cruelest month (spree: article about TV shows getting the axe after sweeps.)

Greedy,Greedy,Greedy · 11-03-2003, 02:30 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by baltassoc
Tomato, tomahto. There ain't no weregeld no more. We have torts, but we also have criminal law. That division is a fundamental change in concept.

No, no, no. The major change in concept was the idea that the Sovereign had a monopoly over the use of force.

Look at it this way. Year 800. Pick your Germanic country. Commit a violent crime. What happens?

(1) there is a price to be paid to the victim;
(2) violence is done to your body by the victim's family.

Fast forward to 2003. Commit a violent crime anywhere in the US.

(1) there is a price to be paid to the victim;
(2) something (maybe not actuall violence) is done with or to your body by the government.

(1) doesn't seem to be the difference. (2) is.

Bad_Rich_Chic · 11-03-2003, 02:31 PM

OK, skirts.

Quote:

Penske
http://www.nytimes.com/2003/11/02/fashion/02SKIR.html

So, my chief problem with this guy's skirt is that it is too long. He looks silly. The utili-kilt pictured in the article is the right length. And, he should probably be wearing taller socks. Or at least butcher boots. He looks like a middle-aged female German tourist.

Men should wear more kilts. I don't know if they should wear more skirts, but they should definitely wear more kilts.

I wouldn't mind seeing the great kilt making a comeback, either, but I acknowledge that the maintenance for day-to-day wearing is much higher.

Shape Shifter · 11-03-2003, 02:31 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by ThurgreedMarshall

She's [Tori's] got the best bod money can buy, but I can't get past the horse face. So, if I've got no shot of marrying her for her money, I couldn't pick her. Besides, Doherty would be a good hate fuck.

TM

Maybe it's just her abnormally large head, but Tori looks frighteningly thin. I'd have to go with the better-fed Doherty. She would certainly have more energy.

ABBAKiss · 11-03-2003, 02:32 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy
Fast forward to 2003. Commit a violent crime anywhere in the US.

(1) there is a price to be paid to the victim;

I wasn't following this conversation, but what is the price paid to the victim?

Greedy,Greedy,Greedy · 11-03-2003, 02:34 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by ABBAKiss
I wasn't following this conversation, but what is the price paid to the victim?

Tort recovery. (Assuming the scumbag, baltassoc in this hypo, has anything worth going after - at least the Viking kidnappers were well-heeled).

Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) · 11-03-2003, 02:35 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by ABBAKiss
I wasn't following this conversation, but what is the price paid to the victim?

$33.5m, if your name is OJ Simpson.

ABBAKiss · 11-03-2003, 02:40 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
$33.5m, if your name is OJ Simpson.

Told you I wasn't following the conversation. I thought it was some argument about how a victim is made whole by having the perp sent to jail.

I hate criminal law. Why can't people just be good and/or cash the checks their dumbasses wrote out without arguing about procedure and civil rights. Fuck that. If you did it, do the time.

No, I will not be your public defender so just drop it.

taxwonk · 11-03-2003, 02:40 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by ThurgreedMarshall
I think both her eyes and teeth are fucked up. She must be really good looking in person because someone this screwed up shouldn't be a sex symbol. Check out the eye problem here:

http://www.shashachu.com/Shannen/charmline.jpg (You'll have to cut and paste the link.)

I defy anyone to find a good photo of her teeth, which must be bad too. She refuses to have them photographed. Her tits on the other hand are a different story.

And now I'm interested in answeing Str8's question for myself. Spelling or Doherty? Hmmmm.

She's got the best bod money can buy, but I can't get past the horse face. So, if I've got no shot of marrying her for her money, I couldn't pick her. Besides, Doherty would be a good hate fuck.

TM

That cover shot has got to be either a really bad paste job or some assclown needs to remember not to do too many bongs before photoshopping the pics. Tori looks positively creaturish in that shot.

dc_chef · 11-03-2003, 02:43 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Bad_Rich_Chic
but I acknowledge that the maintenance for day-to-day wearing is much higher.

It would, however, take freeballing to a whole new level.

ThurgreedMarshall · 11-03-2003, 02:43 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by leagleaze

That's a good photo?

TM