New Fashion Board 10-3-2003 - 11-7-2003 - Page 40

ABBAKiss · 10-08-2003, 01:21 PM

I love the October 8, 2003 ltl/fb. Good stuff.

ThrashersFan · 10-08-2003, 01:23 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by ltl/fb
I thought that was DS. Maybe that's more when taking it up the ass is the topic.

You may be right. Perhaps Thurgreed is just obsessed with my ass and its virginity.

evenodds · 10-08-2003, 01:25 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Pretty Little Flower
If you were to choose one designer to outfit you exclusively, ignoring practical concerns such as money and dressing appropriately for work, who would it be?

I would choose Romeo Gigli.

Alberta Ferretti or Narcisco Rodriguez.

bold_n_brazen · 10-08-2003, 01:25 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by ltl/fb
Oh good, coke is still in. What a relief. Can I do a line off your ass?

No. But you can do one from between my breasts...

ltl/fb · 10-08-2003, 01:26 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by greatwhitenorthchick
That's legal, right? Because [said in deep sonorous voice], we should follow the law.

We only have to obey the laws that are important. Like the immigration laws and the laws against sodomy (which, God willing, will be reinstated as a constitutional amendment toot-sweet). Laws against drugs don't matter, except to the extent that they enable us to catch more illegal immigrants and deport them as felons instead of just illegals. But, anyway, those laws are wrong wrong wrong so there is no need to obey them.

bold_n_brazen · 10-08-2003, 01:26 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Pretty Little Flower
Yes, what happened to fashion? So typical that I am the one who has to bring the topic back to fashion. And so typical that I do so via one of my famous Flowerian Polls. So, as one of my final pre-Lawtalkers Retirement acts, I offer you the following fashion-related poll:

If you were to choose one designer to outfit you exclusively, ignoring practical concerns such as money and dressing appropriately for work, who would it be?

I would choose Romeo Gigli.

J.Lo

ltl/fb · 10-08-2003, 01:28 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by ABBAKiss
I love the October 8, 2003 ltl/fb. Good stuff.

thanks dearest. I hope you have repented of your many sexual sins. Sex is only for procreation and should be done with as little movement on the woman's part as possible (unless she is a whore, in which case she's going to hell anyway so she can twitch her ass like an epileptic if that's what gets the man off). You may need to work on reforming yourself.

Tyrone Slothrop · 10-08-2003, 01:29 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by ThrashersFan
Here is a trick that works every time. Say you are meeting "Jenny" for the first time. As soon as she says "My name is Jenny," you say "Jenny, Jenny bo benny a fe fi fo fenny, JENNY."

If this fails to stick her name in your head it won't matter because she won't come near you for the rest of the night anyway.

See, start working in-house and you can get away with this shit.

NotFromHere · 10-08-2003, 01:31 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Pretty Little Flower
Yes, what happened to fashion? So typical that I am the one who has to bring the topic back to fashion. And so typical that I do so via one of my famous Flowerian Polls. So, as one of my final pre-Lawtalkers Retirement acts, I offer you the following fashion-related poll:

If you were to choose one designer to outfit you exclusively, ignoring practical concerns such as money and dressing appropriately for work, who would it be?

I would choose Romeo Gigli.

Chanel. Or if it's a suit, Giorgio Armani.

notcasesensitive · 10-08-2003, 01:32 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by ltl/fb
We only have to obey the laws that are important. Like the immigration laws and the laws against sodomy (which, God willing, will be reinstated as a constitutional amendment toot-sweet). Laws against drugs don't matter, except to the extent that they enable us to catch more illegal immigrants and deport them as felons instead of just illegals. But, anyway, those laws are wrong wrong wrong so there is no need to obey them.

Even better if you can catch them with bags of drywall and say it's cocaine. Or so I've heard.

dtb · 10-08-2003, 01:33 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by ThrashersFan
Hmmm, perhaps I was making a joke implying that I would, if I had the damn permit, go out and dispose of our homegrown deadbeats. This is the FB not the PB, you don't have to check your sense of humor at the door.

edit: Even if my jokes do tend to suck.

Yeah, that joke was, uh.... subtle.

Tyrone Slothrop · 10-08-2003, 01:34 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by paigowprincess
What I meant was, how come the DMV, which is state govt, doesnt refer the people to the proper authorities? Of course illegals contribute tothe economy and all that, but on a strictly legal basis, they are illegal. So I am just wondering why a govt agency or whatever the DMV is doesnt do the referral?

At the risk that someone else has already said this, the people at the DMV are hard-pressed to refer to the next person in line.

bilmore · 10-08-2003, 01:37 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by greatwhitenorthchick
That's legal, right? Because [said in deep sonorous voice], we should follow the law.

Joking about nitrous? Yeah, that's still legal, I think.

But, "deep"? "Sonorous"? Damn. I'm flattered.

evenodds · 10-08-2003, 01:42 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by notcasesensitive
Even better if you can catch them with bags of drywall and say it's cocaine. Or so I've heard.

That could never ever happen somewhere civilized.

bilmore · 10-08-2003, 01:43 PM

This is cool.

New software that allows you to do TiVo-stuff through your computer, with no boxes to buy or subscriptions to pay for.