LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 156
0 members and 156 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 4,499, 10-26-2015 at 08:55 AM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 06-24-2005, 06:37 PM   #11
Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
Moderator
 
Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Pop goes the chupacabra
Posts: 18,532
The gravity of Clinton's lies.

Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
True. Germane to an impeachment vote, perhaps, if not to perjury.

I seem to recall that the ruling had some definitions of terms that made what Clinton said plausibly accurate, if clearly mendacious in the ordinary context. Do I recall this wrong?
That's what stirred the debate on the meaning of "is". I think a variety of people parsed the ruling, and the definition of sexual contact arguably left out his having his dick touched by a mouth, or something like that. Needless to say, the excuse didn't play much better than the conduct.
Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) is offline  
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:34 PM.