|
I fully support John Roberts for the US Supreme Court
Quote:
Originally posted by Sexual Harassment Panda
NARAL and NOW don't speak for me. I know a fair number of liberals and I can say with confidence they don't speak for them, either. They are out there. Does Mullah Dobson speak for you?
If the Dems in the Senate do that it is stupid. Hear me loud and clear - if the Dems administer a pro-Roe litmus test, it will be the stupidest thing they can do. Far beyond the tactical issues, it also would be overstepping the bounds of what I believe the Senate should do in its advice and consent role, and I think the Republicans will drive a truck through that hole.
|
Hell, it's not even an issue. Stevens, Bryer, Ginsburg, Souter and Kennedy still are going to beat out Scalia, Thomas, new guy, and the player to be named later on overturning Roe. It's when one of the first five retire (or dies, whichever comes first) that we're in for that fight. One hopes that's after 2008.
__________________
"In the olden days before the internet, you'd take this sort of person for a ride out into the woods and shoot them, as Darwin intended, before he could spawn."--Will the Vampire People Leave the Lobby? pg 79
|
Threaded Mode