Fringey's taut-abbed painter

[ltl/fb]

Originally posted by tmdiva
I don't think her ass needs to be bigger or rounder, but her waist definitely needs to be thinner. Maybe I'm biased, but wouldn't a more hourglass-y shape (a la Halle) be preferable?

tm

Then she would be scary skinny. so I vote to expand her ass. that will have the effect of making her waist look smaller.

[Greedy,Greedy,Greedy]

Originally posted by ltl/fb
Then she would be scary skinny. so I vote to expand her ass. that will have the effect of making her waist look smaller.

Her ass will expand with time. The question is, will her waist, too.

[robustpuppy]

Originally posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy
Her ass will expand with time. The question is, will her waist, too.

You are an ass expanding with time.

[ThurgreedMarshall]

Originally posted by tmdiva
I don't think her ass needs to be bigger or rounder, but her waist definitely needs to be thinner. Maybe I'm biased, but wouldn't a more hourglass-y shape (a la Halle) be preferable?

It certainly would be. After all, it's all about the ratio. In fact, a better ratio would make her ass look rounder.

Believe it or not, (from work) it is quite difficult to find photos of nice asses on the internet.

Here is one that may be a little too big for some of you. But you can get a good idea of the ideal shape:



TM

[Greedy,Greedy,Greedy]

Originally posted by robustpuppy
You are an ass expanding with time.

Dear, I've been missing you all afternoon. Where have you been?

[Did you just call me Coltrane?]

Originally posted by ThurgreedMarshall
It certainly would be. After all, it's all about the ratio. In fact, a better ratio would make her ass look rounder.

Believe it or not, (from work) it is quite difficult to find photos of nice asses on the internet.

Here is one that may be a little too big for some of you. But you can get a good idea of the ideal shape:



TM

Did you get this pic from the Wrexx n' Effects web site?

[str8outavannuys]

Originally posted by bilmore
Pedo.

I was watching Love Actually on HBO this weekend. How wrong is it if I thought the girl who sang the "All I Want For Christmas Is You" song in the school pageant was kinda hot?

[Skeks in the city]

Originally posted by barely_legal
I have to agree with RT here. I think it was the best movie I've seen in years. Maybe it's a gender thing?

No, I thought the movie was pretty good. It's more consistently good than Confessions of a Dangerous Mind.

[Hank Chinaski]

[Skeks in the city]

New derivatives here and more are on the way to allow people to take short or long positions on residential housing. Article

Why bet with nutcase, when you can be on bricks and mortar?

[notcasesensitive]

Originally posted by Skeks in the city
New derivatives here and more are on the way to allow people to take short or long positions on residential housing. Article

Why bet with nutcase, when you can be on bricks and mortar?

am I nutcase? if so, the easy answer is that betting with me is free. no downside. and lawyers are a risk-averse group. as you may have noticed.

[Fugee]

Originally posted by Atticus Grinch
Sweet: Marine tells Iraq docs he'd rather they save his wedding ring than his finger.

Sour: The Bush Administration loses the ring.

I hope the doctors went along with this rEdiculous request because they thought saving the finger was iffy at best. Picking a ring over your finger has got to be signs of shock or trauma or something.

My level of sentimentality (especially when it comes to jewelry) makes Thurgreed want to hurl but I would never chose a ring over my finger -- unless maybe the ring was worth a zillion dollars and would be rendered worthless if it were cut off and even then it'd be debatable.

[Diane_Keaton]

Originally posted by ThurgreedMarshall Here is one that may be a little too big for some of you. But you can get a good idea of the ideal shape:



TM

What's striking there is the incredible skin on her butt. Perfectly smooth, without a dimple. The damn thing is glowing. That's getting close to perfection, shapewise. But, sorry -- the best shaped butt award goes to Vida Guerra.


I heart her heart-shaped butt.

[Atticus Grinch]

Originally posted by Alex_de_Large
in looking for that pic of Marla Singer, I came across movie-locations.com which may rival IMdB for time-wastingest site out there...

The front of my office was used in a pivotal scene of a cult comedy of the 1970s. A friend lived in a house that appeared in the same movie. And more than one of my children was born in the hospital in which the movie's denouement goes down.

Needless to say, the movie is near and dear (currently on Tivo).

[SlaveNoMore]

Larry Brooks, probably the best hockey beat writer in NY, has been taking both sides to task in the lockout war. However, he correctly called the players proposal last week the only true effort to resolve the impasse, and now he correctly criticizes the anticipated bush move by the owners - and Bettman's expansion into shitty non-hockey markets - as the death of the League.

____
December 14, 2004 -- TORONTO

Two weeks ago Gary Bettman visited Edmonton and designated the Alberta city as the ultimate NHL small-market representative that would require a hard salary cap to stay in business.
Except there's a significant problem with that portrayal. According to the NHL's own reports, Edmonton is not an NHL small market at all, no matter how much the commissioner and Kevin Lowe whine that it is so. In fact, according to those reports that can be accurately extrapolated from last week's NHLPA CBA proposal, the Oilers last year ranked between 12th and 16th in league revenues.

"Lying comes very easy to these people," Bobby Holik told The Post during a weekend telephone conversation about the lockout. "The owners and league lie all the time to further their agenda.

"What that is, it appears pretty obvious to me at this point, is to break the union and start all over again with entirely new players."

That league agenda of attaining impasse and unilateral implementation in order to hire scabs to play next season will be accelerated here this afternoon when Bettman counters the union's 24% Solution with yet another hard-cap proposal. The meeting is scheduled to begin at 1 p.m. If it commences on time, it should end no later than 1:30, for it's likely that Bob Goodenow and the NHLPA executive board will leave the table immediately upon receipt of the union-busting proposal.

As reported in this space yesterday, the NHL spent the weekend not only damning Thursday's PA proposal that caught the league completely off guard and off balance, but also essentially mocking the offer of an immediate 24 percent salary rollback as little more than a fraudulent gimmick. This was confirmed when TSN yesterday obtained an eight-page memo filled with inflammatory rhetoric written by league VP and counsel Bill Daly that had been distributed to all 30 teams.

"We believe the Union offer was more about trying to unify the players ... than it was about a good faith effort to reach an agreement with us," Daly wrote — or attorney Bob Batterman wrote for him. "The Union needed the 'rallying point' that it felt this offer would provide with the players to effectuate this strategy."

In the memo, Daly confirms the league's intent to eliminate salary arbitration, an objective first communicated to the union in the July 23 letter from Bettman to Goodenow that also put the PA on notice that the league would raise the issues of guaranteed contracts and buyouts. That letter was first exposed and excerpted by The Post on Nov. 14. The NHL has consistently offered the union 53 percent of its declared revenue, an amount that would create a cap of $33.4M per team. Only nine teams entered last season with payrolls under that figure.

The NHL refuses to make public any specific team financial information, releasing instead only league summaries of profits and losses as computed by Arthur Levitt's audit. The union is bound by confidentiality agreements not to release that information. But Exhibit 9 of last week's NHLPA proposal features a revenue-sharing system through which it is possible to rank clubs in order of reported revenue. The Rangers, by the way, are sixth, behind Toronto, Dallas, Colorado, Detroit and Philadelphia.

Interestingly, Nashville (30), Phoenix (29), Atlanta (28) and Carolina (22) rank as four of the lowest nine revenue-producing clubs. Two — Nashville and Atlanta — are recent expansion additions under Bettman's regime. The two others — Phoenix and Carolina — are markets to which Bettman and the board approved moves in the last decade.

Yet the same people who authorized creation of these problem markets are the ones who insist they understand what's best for the long-term health of the game. Sure they are.