LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 816
0 members and 816 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 4,499, 10-26-2015 at 08:55 AM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 06-18-2004, 06:00 PM   #11
Tyrone Slothrop
Moderasaurus Rex
 
Tyrone Slothrop's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 33,053
Farenheit 9/11

Quote:
Originally posted by sgtclub
Why would you think that? Seems to me that Russia may have had a need to protect human assets before now. Are you suggesting that this is a quid pro quo of some sort?
If the administration wanted to tell us that there was credible information that Iraq was planning to attack us, don't you think Vice President Cheney would have been comfortable telling us exactly that, at a level of generality sufficient to avoid burning sources. E.g., he could say it came from an "ally" instead of Russia.

And I didn't say it was a quid pro quo. I said it was clever on Putin's part. What does it cost him?

Do you lack any ability to think critically about this stuff, or do you just decide to suspend disbelief?
__________________
“It was fortunate that so few men acted according to moral principle, because it was so easy to get principles wrong, and a determined person acting on mistaken principles could really do some damage." - Larissa MacFarquhar
Tyrone Slothrop is offline  
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:16 PM.