LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 909
0 members and 909 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 4,499, 10-26-2015 at 08:55 AM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 07-03-2004, 06:51 PM   #11
Hank Chinaski
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
 
Hank Chinaski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,130
The DEMS: Party of Democracy

Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
Wanting to have a choice doesn't mean that more choices still is necessarily good. Think about the shape of the Laffer Curve. Otherwise you'd just use the telephone book as a ballot (or, if the Republicans had their way, the Yellow Pages). Though I agree that there is a certain weird parallel here to events in Minnesota and Missouri, inasmuch as Nader looks and sounds like he's dead.
So you feel that having one D and one R is enough choice. Of course if the D starts collecting some bad baggage you should be able to switch. but we don't need more competition. Seems to me that you'd get Bill Gates on board if you'd just articulate this "1 choice is enough choice" position as a platform plank.
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
Hank Chinaski is offline  
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:00 PM.