LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 479
0 members and 479 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 4,499, 10-26-2015 at 08:55 AM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 05-31-2004, 03:24 AM   #11
Not Me
Too Lazy to Google
 
Not Me's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 4,460
Articles on the nightmare that the House of Saud has perpetrated on the rest of us

Quote:
Originally posted by Say_hello_for_me
Would you settle for a but-for test? But for drugs being illegal, they would be widely available and cheap and relatively unprofitable for criminals. (Your position) Check. But, but for criminals in this country providing a demand for illegal drugs at expensive prices, they would be completely unprofitable for criminals (My position: No demand = No Supply).
in 2004, I often read in the papers about Seagrams and Budweiser executives engaging in drive by shootings to kill off their competitors. Don't you?

Quote:
Originally posted by Say_hello_for_me
You can hide your face in a crowd of criminals and say its the mob at fault, but it doesn't take away your incremental contribution to the harm by way of your incremental demand. And only the Lord knows what message you send to the children of this country when you deny culpability for the harms that result from your actions. A Friday night in Southwest or Lawndale would do your sense of wrong, right.
If the drugs weren't illegal, there wouldn't be the violence associated with their trade. The real crime is sentencing our mentally ill drug addicts to jail instead of rehab.
__________________
IRL I'm Charming.
Not Me is offline  
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:45 PM.