Quote:
Originally posted by Secret_Agent_Man
I agree completely. However, Clinton was still a better choice for president than any of the other options
I certainly agree with you in the abstract. However, I see no indication that you give a rats ass about the rule of law or the rights of man except to the extent it suits your partisan political purposes.
Not at all, and it is a ridciulous comparison, for any number of reasons.
No Penske, you asshole. Someone says she was raped, and might have been raped, 25 years ago. I tend to believe her, but we will never know and can never know the truth (given the facts as alleged). There is a difference.
See above. I'd be willing to give you more credit for actually believing this when I see you apply the same sort of concern for the rule of law to your own political party.
No, you are a tasteless asshole for any number of reasons, but not for typing the above.
Depends . . how do you feel about the snail darter and who is running against you?
S_A_M
|
Billmore's post said essentially what I think. Regardless of my belief in the rule of the law or whether or not I crticise my own party, the lowering ot the standards of acceptability are what is at issue. Rape is a crime. Sexual harassment is indefensible. You and millions of sheeple like you chose a rapist and sexual abuser as your president because Dole or GHWB were that much worse?!?!? They are fairly moderate all things considered. So you chose a rapist, sexual abuser and subsequent perjurer over a moderate republican. A criminal of a level that you probably would never hire to be an associate or even a copy boy in your office. And yet you call me a tasteless asshole. Fuck you. You defend rape and sexual harassment because Bill Clinton was the perpetuator, and in pointing that I realise that the truth hurts but perhaps you should take a look at your moral compass and try to figure our why it is so far awry.
Threaded Mode