Merry Generic Winter Day-Off With No Religious Content

[Adder]

Originally posted by Not Bob
As a reminder, in order to avoid anyone becoming afflicted by the Ruysbroek Syndrome, I suggest that all FBers avoid specifying any sexual activity other than missionary position man/woman sex, fellatio/cunni. . . uh, that word that I can't spell, and giving/receiving lapdances.

Why? Well, while one might think that the denizens of this place, with their low purity scores and wanton eye-ball licking, are tolerant of such things, they are not. "Sure," they say, "I'm all in favor of [insert Not Vanilla activity here]. It's kinky and fun. But [insert other Not Vanilla activity here]? That is sick and disgusting. Ewwwwww." And to make matters worse, there is no consensus on which is fun and which is gross.

So, I have in the past suggested using ["toe-sucking"] as a place holder for this purpose -- when one is talking about what one views as fun, but which is Not Vanilla. And even that has been somewhat controversial. Hmm. Maybe the placeholder should be [Not Vanilla Activity].

Anyway, govern yourselves accordingly.

People regularly tell you (politely, of course) that you are no fun, don't they?

[Hank Chinaski]

Originally posted by Not Bob
As a reminder, in order to avoid anyone becoming afflicted by the Ruysbroek Syndrome, I suggest that all FBers avoid specifying any sexual activity other than missionary position man/woman sex, fellatio/cunni. . . uh, that word that I can't spell, and giving/receiving lapdances.

Why? Well, while one might think that the denizens of this place, with their low purity scores and wanton eye-ball licking, are tolerant of such things, they are not. "Sure," they say, "I'm all in favor of [insert Not Vanilla activity here]. It's kinky and fun. But [insert other Not Vanilla activity here]? That is sick and disgusting. Ewwwwww." And to make matters worse, there is no consensus on which is fun and which is gross.

So, I have in the past suggested using ["toe-sucking"] as a place holder for this purpose -- when one is talking about what one views as fun, but which is Not Vanilla. And even that has been somewhat controversial. Hmm. Maybe the placeholder should be [Not Vanilla Activity].

Anyway, govern yourselves accordingly.

that is one effective option. another option is to not start licking asshole in the first place.

[ThurgreedMarshall]

Originally posted by Not Bob
As a reminder, in order to avoid anyone becoming afflicted by the Ruysbroek Syndrome, I suggest that all FBers avoid specifying any sexual activity other than missionary position man/woman sex, fellatio/cunni. . . uh, that word that I can't spell, and giving/receiving lapdances.

Why? Well, while one might think that the denizens of this place, with their low purity scores and wanton eye-ball licking, are tolerant of such things, they are not. "Sure," they say, "I'm all in favor of [insert Not Vanilla activity here]. It's kinky and fun. But [insert other Not Vanilla activity here]? That is sick and disgusting. Ewwwwww." And to make matters worse, there is no consensus on which is fun and which is gross.

So, I have in the past suggested using ["toe-sucking"] as a place holder for this purpose -- when one is talking about what one views as fun, but which is Not Vanilla. And even that has been somewhat controversial. Hmm. Maybe the placeholder should be [Not Vanilla Activity].

Anyway, govern yourselves accordingly.

Why are you trying to make the FB some kind of homogenous, nicey nice board that no one would want to read?

TM

[bold_n_brazen]

Originally posted by ThurgreedMarshall
Why are you trying to make the FB some kind of homogenous, nicey nice board that no one would want to read?

TM

Can't you hear the Don McLean playing in the background?

This world was never meant for anyone as beautiful as you, indeed.

[Greedy,Greedy,Greedy]

Originally posted by Not Bob
As a reminder, in order to avoid anyone becoming afflicted by the Ruysbroek Syndrome, I suggest that all FBers avoid specifying any sexual activity other than missionary position man/woman sex, fellatio/cunni. . . uh, that word that I can't spell, and giving/receiving lapdances.

Why? Well, while one might think that the denizens of this place, with their low purity scores and wanton eye-ball licking, are tolerant of such things, they are not. "Sure," they say, "I'm all in favor of [insert Not Vanilla activity here]. It's kinky and fun. But [insert other Not Vanilla activity here]? That is sick and disgusting. Ewwwwww." And to make matters worse, there is no consensus on which is fun and which is gross.

So, I have in the past suggested using ["toe-sucking"] as a place holder for this purpose -- when one is talking about what one views as fun, but which is Not Vanilla. And even that has been somewhat controversial. Hmm. Maybe the placeholder should be [Not Vanilla Activity].

Anyway, govern yourselves accordingly.

Look, we all know that dark things go on in Podunkville. I know you try to keep it hidden, but I've seen "Naked Kiss".

[Secret_Agent_Man]

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
Ty could make an argument of the malum pro se malum prohibitum (I know these are spelled wrong but big deal) variety-

The funny part is that you spelled both of them correctly.

Ya' gotta believe.

S_A_M

[Oliver_Wendell_Ramone]

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
that is one effective option. another option is to not start licking asshole in the first place.

Even admitting to the ass licking won't, alone, lead to MR syndrome. The real problems arise when you admit to the asshole licking within days of posting a photo of the person whose asshole is being licked.

[Not Bob]

Originally posted by ThurgreedMarshall
Why are you trying to make the FB some kind of homogenous, nicey nice board that no one would want to read?

Is that what you think that I am doing? To the contrary, my good man. It's the current climate which freezes discussion of anything sexual (other than the only slighly exaggerated categories I listed), not my nicey-niceness. I simply offered a warning to any unwary, and a suggestion on how to get around the impure bluenoses.

Speaking of nicey-nice, I embrace my nicey-niceness. But why do you suggest that I am trying to make this place homogenous?

[Secret_Agent_Man]

Originally posted by ThurgreedMarshall
I also see that you purposely ignored the other hypotheticals I posed. But that's cool. They probably don't fit anywhere into your argument anyway.

That's how we roll on the PB.

S_A_M

[ABBAKiss]

Originally posted by Not Bob
[Not Vanilla Activity].

Anyway, govern yourselves accordingly.

No. Fucking. Way.

[greatwhitenorthchick]

Originally posted by Not Bob
Is that what you think that I am doing? To the contrary, my good man. It's the current climate which freezes discussion of anything sexual (other than the only slighly exaggerated categories I listed), not my nicey-niceness. I simply offered a warning to any unwary, and a suggestion on how to get around the impure bluenoses.

Speaking of nicey-nice, I embrace my nicey-niceness. But why do you suggest that I am trying to make this place homogenous?

I am not sure that I have everything straight. I didn't think there was any sort of chilling effect or hostile climate caused by MR posting about his inclinations, just good-natured ribbing leading to his eventual nickname of Rimjob. Which has now been used so often (although he hasn't been around for years) that it's kind of lost its effect. If someone were to post about his/her poo fetish, that might lead to expressions of disgust and some kind of perjorative nickname, but life would go on. I always thought people were generally free to talk about whatever pleased them -- they just had to be willing to deal with it if something that pleases them is a little non-mainstream and they got made fun of for it.

If I have missed something along the way, please set me straight.

[Tyrone Slothrop]

Originally posted by Secret_Agent_Man
That's how we roll on the PB.

By PM, TM explained that the hypotheticals that I ignored were Hank's, not his. Truly, that is how we roll on the PB.

[bold_n_brazen]

Originally posted by Not Bob
Is that what you think that I am doing? To the contrary, my good man. It's the current climate which freezes discussion of anything sexual (other than the only slighly exaggerated categories I listed), not my nicey-niceness. I simply offered a warning to any unwary, and a suggestion on how to get around the impure bluenoses.

Speaking of nicey-nice, I embrace my nicey-niceness. But why do you suggest that I am trying to make this place homogenous?

Please define "current climate" and explain how you think it came to be.

[Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)]

Originally posted by greatwhitenorthchick
I am not sure that I have everything straight. I didn't think there was any sort of chilling effect or hostile climate caused by MR posting about his inclinations, just good-natured ribbing leading to his eventual nickname of Rimjob. Which has now been used so often (although he hasn't been around for years) that it's kind of lost its effect. If someone were to post about his/her poo fetish, that might lead to expressions of disgust and some kind of perjorative nickname, but life would go on. I always thought people were generally free to talk about whatever pleased them -- they just had to be willing to deal with it if something that pleases them is a little non-mainstream and they got made fun of for it.

If I have missed something along the way, please set me straight.

Well put, miss comes-from-giving-head.

[Adder]

Originally posted by Oliver_Wendell_Ramone
Even admitting to the ass licking won't, alone, lead to MR syndrome. The real problems arise when you admit to the asshole licking within days of posting a photo of the person whose asshole is being licked.

There was a photo? I don't remember a photo. Huh.