Drive fast, live hard, no regrets... Sorry Penske

[bold_n_brazen]

Originally posted by ltl/fb
How is it that you can tell?

Because an uncircumsized penis still has a foreskin and a circumsized penis does not.

This is not that difficult.

[ltl/fb]

Originally posted by bold_n_brazen
Because an uncircumsized penis still has a foreskin and a circimsized penis does not.

This is not that difficult.

I know, which is why I am thoroughly bemused by your contention that there is nothing visual by which one can differentiate the circumsized from the uncircumsized. Of course now you are totally contradicting yourself, you freak. Did you get smacked in the head during the hurricane?

My question was really whether the foreskin is visible when the penis is erect. This stemmed from a comment/question from Sebby which I will go find.

[bold_n_brazen]

Originally posted by ltl/fb
Can you see this "foreskin" of which you speak when the penis is both erect and flaccid?

On some penises, you can indeed.

[ltl/fb]

Originally posted by bold_n_brazen
On some penises, you can indeed.

If you can't see it on someone who is uncut, how do you know he is uncut?

ETA ah, it was Coltrane "Is it different when erect too, or only when flacid?" dtb non-answered by saying, "why would I have seen it flaccid?" and I brought up the question again. You then brought up this nonsense about how there is nothing to distinguish a cut penis from an uncut penis when you look at it.

[bold_n_brazen]

Originally posted by ltl/fb
If you can't see it on someone who is uncut, how do you know he is uncut?

Presumably, prior to seeing the penis erect, you've seen the penis flaccid.

In the alternative, after seeing the penis erect, you will see the penis flaccid.

I cannot believe we are having this conversation.

[Oliver_Wendell_Ramone]

Originally posted by ltl/fb
If you can't see it on someone who is uncut, how do you know he is uncut?

The smegma would be one clue, I'd guess.

[notcasesensitive]

Originally posted by bold_n_brazen
Presumably, prior to seeing the penis erect, you've seen the penis flaccid.

In the alternative, after seeing the penis erect, you will see the penis flaccid.

I cannot believe we are having this conversation.

Your answers have been quite hepful. Maybe a diagram or a picture would help? Any uncircumsized FBer's willing to post a photo on the Adult Board?

[ltl/fb]

Originally posted by bold_n_brazen
Presumably, prior to seeing the penis erect, you've seen the penis flaccid.

In the alternative, after seeing the penis erect, you will see the penis flaccid.

I cannot believe we are having this conversation.

So you have spent all this time to say, yes, ltl, when erect you cannot see the foreskin but when flaccid you can always see the foreskin, or when erect you can sometimes see the foreskin but sometimes not, but when flaccid you can always see it?

I have only seen flaccid. As I said earlier. Hence my question about whether they look different erect.

Go find me the fucking website for the L'Enfant Plaza Hotel. I want to see what restaurants it has and what the room service hours are.

[ltl/fb]

Originally posted by notcasesensitive
Your answers have been quite hepful. Maybe a diagram or a picture would help? Any uncircumsized FBer's willing to post a photo on the Adult Board?

They have not been helpful to me, since she says they are not differentiable by appearance, but then yaps about foreskins, which are apparently visible, but somehow do not affect the appearance.

I refused to blow the one I saw flaccid.

[NotFromHere]

Originally posted by ltl/fb


Go find me the fucking website for the L'Enfant Plaza Hotel. I want to see what restaurants it has and what the room service hours are.

Here already

Scroll down for room service and restaurants.

[bold_n_brazen]

Originally posted by ltl/fb
So you have spent all this time to say, yes, ltl, when erect you cannot see the foreskin but when flaccid you can always see the foreskin, or when erect you can sometimes see the foreskin but sometimes not, but when flaccid you can always see it?

I have only seen flaccid. As I said earlier. Hence my question about whether they look different erect.

Go find me the fucking website for the L'Enfant Plaza Hotel. I want to see what restaurants it has and what the room service hours are.

Yes. I thought that's what I'd been saying all along.

And I'm not your fucking secretary. Find it yourself.

[notcasesensitive]

Originally posted by ltl/fb
They have not been helpful to me, since she says they are not differentiable by appearance, but then yaps about foreskins, which are apparently visible, but somehow do not affect the appearance.

I refused to blow the one I saw flaccid.

hepful. jesus. I was on your side here.

[bold_n_brazen]

Originally posted by ltl/fb
They have not been helpful to me, since she says they are not differentiable by appearance, but then yaps about foreskins, which are apparently visible, but somehow do not affect the appearance.

I refused to blow the one I saw flaccid.

I never said that they were not differentiable by appearance.

I was simply trying to point out that saying that all uncut penises were I-don't-even-remember-what is like saying that all jewish girls give bad head. Or that all women from Texas have big hair.

[ltl/fb]

Originally posted by bold_n_brazen
I never said that they were not differentiable by appearance.

I was simply trying to point out that saying that all uncut penises were I-don't-even-remember-what is like saying that all jewish girls give bad head. Or that all women from Texas have big hair.

Yes, and I was looking for the answer to a specific question. And if you weren't answering that question, you should have said you weren't answering that question.

And, "I don't think you can say that circumsized penises look this way and uncircumsized penises look that way" says to me that they are not differentiable by appearance. Especially when it was in answer to the question "How are uncircumsized erect penises, as a group, visually differentiable from circumsized erect penises?"

Unless "visually" and "by appearance" are somehow really very different things.

You are not smart enough to be my secretary.

[ltl/fb]

Originally posted by notcasesensitive
hepful. jesus. I was on your side here.

Sorry. I misread. Dinner on me?