Fashionistas you have arrived 3-25-03 - 10-3-03

[ThrashersFan]

"American Idol" winner Ruben Studdard has sued hip-hop clothing maker 205 Flava Inc., saying the company wrongly profited from his image after he wore its jerseys on the singing competition.

The lawsuit says the defendants have unfairly and unlawfully exploited and capitalized on Studdard's popularity.

It estimates the company has made at least $2 million in sales after exploiting Studdard's image, and that Studdard is entitled to some of the profits.



http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,93511,00.html

[Atticus Grinch]

Originally posted by idle acts
Which is why the government (state and federal) needs to get out of the business of according people benefits based upon their marital status. Either marriage is a civil law institution or it's a religious one.

Until religion is no more, it will always be both. Having two adults as the basic generational family unit is hardwired into our evolutionary history. So it was formalized with a religious overlay for millennia. Sex was the reason we formed pair bonds, but religion was what kept us from breaking them at will. The state cannot simply say, "We recognize these two are one" without heavily relying upon its deep resonance with notions of romantic love, devotion, eternity and fidelity that are echoes of Western religious tradition.

As for affording "benefits" based on marital status, I have no idea how the state can stop doing so. The tax benefit/burden issue is complicated and can be easily reset --- maybe it should be. But when a person becomes incompetent, who else but their spouse will speak for them? When a person dies intestate, who else but their spouse will inherit?

Religion is the reason we have dissolution proceedings rather than "see ya!" I'm all in favor of no-fault divorce, because the alternative was so horrific. But, even putting religion aside, the state still has an interest in making divorce somewhat messy and expensive, because a two-parent family is more likely to be self-sufficient and economically efficient. (I think we should do things that encourage intergenerational living, too, because I think that's also more efficient than alternatives.)

If civil, then everybody gets to share in the benefits equally, and those of you who want to have an additional, separate, religious ceremony can do so.

That's basically what we're moving toward, hampered only by fundamentalism's hold on the American psyche. We make fun of the Northern European welfare states, but socially we'll be there in twenty years. We'll go there kicking and screaming, though.

[idle acts]

Originally posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy
This is why Bush and the Pope have gotten in bed together. . .

Now there's an idea.

[NotFromHere]

In case you haven't had enough dog talk here's a website of animal dildos. It's a little confusing since it doesn't say whether these "toys" are to be used for humans or animals - but I'll have to admit to not having read it too closely.

Animal dildos

The wolf one is bizarre.

[purse junkie]

Originally posted by NotFromHere
In case you haven't had enough dog talk here's a website of animal dildos. It's a little confusing since it doesn't say whether these "toys" are to be used for humans or animals - but I'll have to admit to not having read it too closely.

Animal dildos

The wolf one is bizarre.

Any pervert comes near my dog (nonconsensually, which I believe would be the case) or even near his image will get his or her freak ass kicked into next month.

[leagleaze]

Originally posted by NotFromHere
In case you haven't had enough dog talk here's a website of animal dildos. It's a little confusing since it doesn't say whether these "toys" are to be used for humans or animals - but I'll have to admit to not having read it too closely.

Animal dildos

The wolf one is bizarre.

That's ... unique. It looks like they are supposed to be copies of the penises of the different animals (am I still allowed to talk about penises, I didn't see my name on the list) for use by humans.

[ThrashersFan]

Originally posted by NotFromHere
In case you haven't had enough dog talk here's a website of animal dildos. It's a little confusing since it doesn't say whether these "toys" are to be used for humans or animals - but I'll have to admit to not having read it too closely.

Animal dildos

The wolf one is bizarre.

Um, exactly what kind of Google search leads a person to a website full of canine-based pleasuring devices? I would really like to avoid Googling anything remotely close to this.

[idle acts]

Originally posted by Atticus Grinch
notions of romantic love, devotion, eternity and fidelity . . . are echoes of Western religious tradition.

I disagree. These notions are older than Western religious tradition (if by that you mean Judeo-Christian trandition), and do not need a religious underpinning to exist.

As for affording "benefits" based on marital status, I have no idea how the state can stop doing so. The tax benefit/burden issue is complicated and can be easily reset --- maybe it should be. But when a person becomes incompetent, who else but their spouse will speak for them? When a person dies intestate, who else but their spouse will inherit?

You make the point of gay activists who seek equality in this area. Gay partners want they same right to visit their loved ones in the hospital, make health care decisions for unconcious or mentally incompetent partners, direct funeral arrangements, and inherit property that straight married people have. But the government has denied gay people those rights by refusing them marriage licenses.

[Atticus Grinch]

Plaintiff's lawyers who lost their $145 billion verdict on appeal seek rehearing on ground that 59 pages of the 68-page opinion was a verbatim replication of their opponent's briefs. (Spree: ABA website; you can pretend you're working.)

Best quotation:

Florida’s judicial code of conduct does not specify that judges must use original thought in their opinions, says Brooke Kennerly, executive director of the Judicial Qualifications Commission for Florida.

[Sidd Finch]

Originally posted by ThrashersFan
I have never had the pleasure of viewing his magazine (or any other nudie book for that matter)

Yer kidding. You've never, ever looked at nekkid pictures? What about online?

Let me recommend that you do not start with Larry Flynt's flagship publication. That's jumping in the deep end and then some. It's rougly as sexy as an OBGYN textbook.

The above based on what the mags looked like about 20 years ago, which is the last time I saw one. Which is scary, in and of itself.

Sidd(singin' me and Bilmore down by the old folks' home)Finch

[Sidd Finch]

Originally posted by idle acts
You make the point of gay activists who seek equality in this area. Gay partners want they same right to visit their loved ones in the hospital, make health care decisions for unconcious or mentally incompetent partners, direct funeral arrangements, and inherit property that straight married people have. But the government has denied gay people those rights by refusing them marriage licenses.

I think that was his point. I'm pretty confident that, if Atticus were king, gay people could marry.


And Jodi Foster would be one of his handmaidens, no doubt.

[NotFromHere]

Originally posted by ThrashersFan
Um, exactly what kind of Google search leads a person to a website full of canine-based pleasuring devices? I would really like to avoid Googling anything remotely close to this.

Not all are canine - some are equine.

[leagleaze]

Originally posted by Sidd Finch
I think that was his point. I'm pretty confident that, if Atticus were king, gay people could marry.


And Jodi Foster would be one of his handmaidens, no doubt.

I get that idea too. About being able to marry not about Jodi Foster. But I do concur that Jodi Foster would be a good handmaiden.

Anybody have any advice on how I can keep myself safe from the crazy homophobes who I filmed protesting this weekend? Apparently they are...perturbed with me, they know who I am because I testified against them last year and I'll be doing so again this year. And now my family has me all paranoid about it.

I wish I was even half joking about this one.

[sebastian_dangerfield]

Originally posted by Atticus Grinch
Until religion is no more, it will always be both. Having two adults as the basic generational family unit is hardwired into our evolutionary history. So it was formalized with a religious overlay for millennia. Sex was the reason we formed pair bonds, but religion was what kept us from breaking them at will. The state cannot simply say, "We recognize these two are one" without heavily relying upon its deep resonance with notions of romantic love, devotion, eternity and fidelity that are echoes of Western religious tradition.

As for affording "benefits" based on marital status, I have no idea how the state can stop doing so. The tax benefit/burden issue is complicated and can be easily reset --- maybe it should be. But when a person becomes incompetent, who else but their spouse will speak for them? When a person dies intestate, who else but their spouse will inherit?

Religion is the reason we have dissolution proceedings rather than "see ya!" I'm all in favor of no-fault divorce, because the alternative was so horrific. But, even putting religion aside, the state still has an interest in making divorce somewhat messy and expensive, because a two-parent family is more likely to be self-sufficient and economically efficient. (I think we should do things that encourage intergenerational living, too, because I think that's also more efficient than alternatives.)



That's basically what we're moving toward, hampered only by fundamentalism's hold on the American psyche. We make fun of the Northern European welfare states, but socially we'll be there in twenty years. We'll go there kicking and screaming, though.

We're closer to Sweden than we think. We have a bloated public sector which cannot afford to provide the 8 billion services it offers just like the Swedes. The only difference between the two countries is the tax system.

One of the very few good things to come out of this presidency will be that a whole lotta services will wither and fall away. A whittling down of the govt's service organizations is sorely needed.

S(fuck, I think I just walked over to the politics board)D

[leagleaze]

http://www.ananova.com/news/story/sm...howbizquirkies Apparently she is distressed they removed her nipples from some pictures.

What a sin!







I think maybe I need to go see this movie.