» Site Navigation |
|
|
![Closed Thread](http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/images/buttons/threadclosed.gif) |
|
08-03-2006, 06:27 PM
|
#3961
|
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Monty Capuletti's gazebo
Posts: 26,203
|
One wit provalone and peppers
Quote:
Originally posted by ltl/fb
Stubble is bad.
|
Makes pitching impossible.
Like getting a blow job from a cat.*
*Actual feline...
__________________
All is for the best in the best of all possible worlds.
Last edited by sebastian_dangerfield; 08-03-2006 at 06:31 PM..
|
|
|
08-03-2006, 06:30 PM
|
#3962
|
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Monty Capuletti's gazebo
Posts: 26,203
|
What comes by nature costs no money.
Quote:
Originally posted by ThurgreedMarshall
Fuck that. Bookman could have popped up 100 times and if they gave him a monologue like the one at the end of the episode he was in, he would be hilarious every time.
And Steinbrenner wasn't that funny. It was the reactions to him that made the character.
TM
|
Dissent, strenuously (almost to the point of giving myself a hernia). Character worked because it was so fucking odd and quirky it only popped up a few times, and have killer lines each time. Used frequently, those limited lines would dry up fast.
Agreed. But the voice was funny, since it sounds nothing like Steinbrenner and made Steinbrenner into a full on imbecile (not that he's not one IRL... just not the full on flaming idiot the show made him).
__________________
All is for the best in the best of all possible worlds.
|
|
|
08-03-2006, 06:32 PM
|
#3963
|
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Monty Capuletti's gazebo
Posts: 26,203
|
Riders on the Storm
Quote:
Originally posted by NotFromHere
Yeah they both sucked. Penny Royal Tea was a huge disappointment. But they didn't suck as hard as Josh, who continues to underwhelm me. His reggae sucked. Hard.
Under most improved, Ryan really surprised me. I had written him off. He was good.
|
I'm really shocked they couldn't get decent, authentic sounding reggae on that show.
__________________
All is for the best in the best of all possible worlds.
|
|
|
08-03-2006, 06:34 PM
|
#3964
|
WacKtose Intolerant
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: PenskeWorld
Posts: 11,627
|
One wit provalone and peppers
Quote:
Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
Makes pitching impossible.
Like getting a blow job from a cat.*
*Actual feline...
|
How do you know?
__________________
Since I'm a righteous man, I don't eat ham;
I wish more people was alive like me
|
|
|
08-03-2006, 06:36 PM
|
#3965
|
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Monty Capuletti's gazebo
Posts: 26,203
|
One wit provalone and peppers
Quote:
Originally posted by Penske_Account
How do you know?
|
1. Squeeze the oil from the canned tuna fish into your palm.
2. Begin masturbatin...
No. I'm not doing that one.
__________________
All is for the best in the best of all possible worlds.
|
|
|
08-03-2006, 06:41 PM
|
#3966
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: on an elliptical
Posts: 5,364
|
Lingerie
So I went to saks today.
I know some are of the "not a fan" about the lingerie. But if you had to choose:
La perla
Cosabella
Agent Provocateur
Hanky Panky
Eres?
what is the best?
|
|
|
08-03-2006, 06:45 PM
|
#3967
|
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Pop goes the chupacabra
Posts: 18,532
|
Lingerie
Quote:
Originally posted by patentparanyc
So I went to saks today.
I know some are of the "not a fan" about the lingerie. But if you had to choose:
La perla
Cosabella
Agent Provocateur
Hanky Panky
Eres?
what is the best?
|
Which of those is most expensive? That's the best one.
__________________
[Dictated but not read]
|
|
|
08-03-2006, 06:49 PM
|
#3968
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Flyover land
Posts: 19,042
|
Lingerie
Quote:
Originally posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
Which of those is most expensive? That's the best one.
|
www.greatexpectation.biz -- There's some REALLY expensive stuff on here. Plus cheapass cosabella and la perla. I can't remember the names of the really expensive kinds and netnanny won't let me go to the site.
|
|
|
08-03-2006, 06:49 PM
|
#3969
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: on an elliptical
Posts: 5,364
|
Lingerie
Quote:
Originally posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
Which of those is most expensive? That's the best one.
|
all comparable prices
I guess the better question is which one is better for the not so flat chested?
|
|
|
08-03-2006, 06:50 PM
|
#3970
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: on an elliptical
Posts: 5,364
|
Lingerie
Quote:
Originally posted by ltl/fb
www.greatexpectation.biz -- There's some REALLY expensive stuff on here. Plus cheapass cosabella and la perla. I can't remember the names of the really expensive kinds and netnanny won't let me go to the site.
|
Thanks fringey nice site.
|
|
|
08-03-2006, 06:51 PM
|
#3971
|
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Pop goes the chupacabra
Posts: 18,532
|
Lingerie
Quote:
Originally posted by patentparanyc
all comparable prices
I guess the better question is which one is better for the not so flat chested?
|
If you post a pic, we can give much better advice.
Perhaps the Manzier, from Kramerica industries?
__________________
[Dictated but not read]
|
|
|
08-03-2006, 06:52 PM
|
#3972
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Throwing a kettle over a pub
Posts: 14,743
|
Lingerie
Quote:
Originally posted by patentparanyc
So I went to saks today.
I know some are of the "not a fan" about the lingerie. But if you had to choose:
La perla
Cosabella
Agent Provocateur
Hanky Panky
Eres?
what is the best?
|
I prefer Frederick's of Hollywood. Crotchless = easy access.
__________________
No no no, that's not gonna help. That's not gonna help and I'll tell you why: It doesn't unbang your Mom.
|
|
|
08-03-2006, 06:52 PM
|
#3973
|
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: i put on my robe and wizard hat
Posts: 4,837
|
Since this is "Post an Article Day"
Quote:
Originally posted by taxwonk
Well, actually it's you and people just like you.
|
Man, you must have really picked the wrong mentor. Me, I just hung out with the mailroom guys.
__________________
I'm going to become rich and famous after I invent a device that allows you to stab people in the face over the internet.
|
|
|
08-03-2006, 06:54 PM
|
#3974
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Flyover land
Posts: 19,042
|
Lingerie
Quote:
Originally posted by Did you just call me Coltrane?
I prefer Frederick's of Hollywood. Crotchless = easy access.
|
Why bother wearing bottoms?
|
|
|
08-03-2006, 06:58 PM
|
#3975
|
WacKtose Intolerant
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: PenskeWorld
Posts: 11,627
|
Lingerie
Quote:
Originally posted by ltl/fb
Why bother wearing bottoms?
|
This is why I like the utilikilt, I have total unimpeded access. The gussetted pockets are great for holding a bottle of lube.
__________________
Since I'm a righteous man, I don't eat ham;
I wish more people was alive like me
|
|
|
![Closed Thread](http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/images/buttons/threadclosed.gif) |
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|